point of time, some unwarranted litigations were started against plaintiff to grab his lands, therefore, plaintiff had to execute an ostensible sale deed dated 5.12.1977 in relation to his lands of Khasras No.674, 675, 511, 490, 428 and 177 measuring 1.78 hectare (7 Bigha 1 Biswa), in favour of defendant No.1 Smt. Suraji. Plaintiff alleged that this sale deed dated 5.12.1977 was a fictitious document and indeed neither possession was delivered nor any sale consideration was received. Later on defendant No.1 agreed to re-transfer and for re-entering the lands in question, in the name of plaintiff in the revenue record and for this purpose one agreement dated 26.3.1986 was executed in presence of family members and relatives, on assurance to make payment of Rs.28,000/- by the plaintiff. It is further stated that Rs.20,000/was paid in cash to the persons who congregated at the time of execution of the agreement dated 26.3.1986, according to instructions of defendant No.1 and other family members and later on Rs.8000/- was paid to defendant No.1. It was averred that defendant No.1 was sister of plaintiff, and both were in cordial relations. But later on, when plaintiff came to know that defendant No.1 is going to breach the terms of agreement dated 26.3.1986 and is inclined to transfer the lands in question in favour of other persons, plaintiff had to institute the present civil suit on 28.2.1992. It appears that thereafter, defendant No.1 executed the registered sale deed dated 1.6.1992, therefore, plaintiff impleaded the subsequent purchasers as party defendants No.2 to 7 in the present suit.
