The High Court disposed of a first appeal for specific performance by recording a mutual compromise between parties. The Court also granted a refund of court fees to the appellant.
The first appeal is disposed of on terms of compromise; court fees paid by the appellant in the appeal are allowed to be refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 531/2015
Vishnu Singh S/o Chhatar Singh, R/o Vill. Sewar, Teh. And Distt. Bharatpur
----Appellant
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Nikhlesh Katara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Bhardwaj
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order
04/08/2022
(2 of 2)
[CFA-531/2015]
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SACHIN/66
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.c. SubramaniamReferred¶21
High Court of Judicature at Madras Vs. M.c. Subramaniam [(2021) 3 SCC 560] · Who else cites this
Mool Singh Vs. Abdul JabbarReferred¶21
Mool Singh Vs. Abdul Jabbar [(2012) 1 DNJ Raj. 31]
Mangi Lal Vs. State of Raj.Referred¶21
Mangi Lal Vs. State of Raj. [(2018) 3 RLW 2129 Raj.]
Avdesh Kumar Gupta vs. Ramavatar Gupta And Anr.Referred¶21
Avdesh Kumar Gupta vs. Ramavatar Gupta And Anr.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vishnu Singh
Hari Singh
Purushottam
SUDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
