Appellant firm alleging non-existence was dismissed as the appeal abated because the firm no longer existed and no representative was available.
Record sent back with order of dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No.304/1996
M/s Diwan Shah Traders, Karim Manzil, M.I. Road, Jaipur through its Proprietor Shri Barkat Ali son of Shri Nanu Khan
----Plaintiff-Appellant
Versus
----Defendant-Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. P C Jain, through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. S C Mittal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
01/12/2022
(2 of 2)
[CFA-304/1996]
contacted to him though he has written letters twice. Therefore, counsel for appellant has pleaded no instructions.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SAURABH/82
M/s Diwan Shah Traders
Food Corporation Of India
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
