No appearance. Appellant does not want to prosecute civil first appeal. Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 104/1992
Sukh Lal
----Appellant
Versus
Rajasthan Housing Board And Anr.
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Nonepresent |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
02/08/2022
No one has appeared on behalf of both the parties. No one had appeared on behalf of appellant on earlier dates 11.07.2022, 20.07.2022 & 28.07.2022.
It appears that the appellant does not want to prosecute the present civil first appeal.
Accordingly, the present civil first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
6-nidhi/-
Sukh Lal
Rajasthan Housing Board
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
