In a review writ petition, the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur dismissed the review application after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to subsequent developments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT of JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 197/2019
Rajendra Kumar Razdan Aged 53 Years, S/o Late Dr. Shamboo Nath Razdan, R/o 113, Chetak Marg, Udaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Balia.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS
(2 of 2)
[WRW-197/2019]
Order
13/01/2021
Learned counsel appearing for the review-petitioner submits that in view of subsequent developments, the instant review petition has rendered infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
(RAMESHWAR VYAS),J
(SANGEET LODHA),J
9-DJ/-
Rajendra Kumar Razdan
Ms. T. Srinivasan
Ms. Rukmani Haldia
Sh. G.S. Sandhu
Ms. Aparna Arora
Sh. Anand Kumar
Sangeet Lodha
Rameshwar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
