Disposal of a writ contempt petition where the High Court found that the impugned order had been complied with by the respondents.
Not applicable as no substantive relief was granted other than dismissal of contempt proceedings and discharge of notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Contempt No. 162/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi Mr. HS Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Ms. Rekha Borana, AAG Mr. Sunil Joshi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Judgment / Order
21/10/2021
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
(2 of 2)
[WCP-162/2018]
The compliance report has been submitted by Ms. Rekha Borana, AAG and we are satisfied that the order passed by this Court has been complied with by the respondents.
Hence, no further order is required to be passed in this contempt petition and the same is hereby dismissed.
Notices of contempt stands discharge.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
45-mohit/-
Jagdish
Hanuman Sankhla
Ramprasad Bhati
Kanwari Lal Bhati
Shri Kumar Pal Gautam
State Of Rajasthan
Vijay Bishnoi
Sudev Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
