Allowed

Rajendra Pareek Son of Nathuram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Nov 2021SOSR/304/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Bench order allowing suspension of sentence for a petitioner convicted under Sections 279 and 304A IPC, contingent upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties during the pendency of a related revision petition.

What did the court decide?

Execution of sentence suspended pending revision petition upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Rajendra Pareek Son of Nathuram Vs State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

¶2

BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence

¶4

Application No.304/2021

¶5

¶6

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1131/2021

¶7

Rajendra Pareek Son of Nathuram, Resident of Raiwasa, Police Station Ranoli, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sikar)

¶8

----Accused-Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶11

----Non-Petitioner

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramapati Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, P.P.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶14

Order

¶15

17/11/2021

¶16

This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the applicant seeking suspension of his sentence.

¶17

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant was convicted by the Trial Court vide its judgment dated 19.07.2018 for the offence under Section(s) 279 & 304A IPC and sentenced as under:-

¶18

For offence under Section 279 IPC- Simple Imprisonment of six months.

¶19

For offence under Section 304A IPC- Simple Imprisonment of one year.

¶20

The appellant-applicant thereafter filed an appeal, but the appellate Court vide its judgment dated 03.09.2021 dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment passed by the Trial Court.

¶21

(2 of 2)

¶22

[SOSR-304/2021]

¶23

Learned counsel further submits that at present accused applicant is confined in district jail, Sikar since the order dated 03.09.2021. He has prayed that this application for suspension of sentence of the applicant may be allowed and sentence of the applicant may be suspended during the pendency of the petition.

¶24

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed same.

¶25

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and carefully scanned the entire material available on record, this suspension of sentence application filed by the applicant is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to accused applicant Rajendra Pareek S/o Nathuram by the Trial Court and affirmed by the Appellate Court shall remain suspended during the pendency of the petition, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each before the concerned Trial Court to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 17^th December, 2021 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶26

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶27

DANISH USMANI /15

Rajendra Pareek Son of Nathuram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Pareek Son of Nathuram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohit Gupta S/O Mahaveer Prasad Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagirath Machra S/O Shri Jugtaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Abdul Hameed Son of Samda Ji Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh Kumar Sharma S/O Late Shri Jagdish Narayan Sharma B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Sharvan Meena Son of Shri Prahlad Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Shankarlal S/O Ladunath Vs State of Rajasthan