Allowed

Amrat Lal Son of Phool v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Nov 2021SOSR/300/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a suspension of sentence application filed by an accused convicted and sentenced for offences under Sections 457 and 380 IPC. The petition was granted during the pendency of the criminal revision petition, subject to furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Suspended the execution of the sentence awarded by the Trial Court and affirmed by the Appellate Court during the pendency of the petition, contingent upon the furnishing of a personal bond and sureti

Amrat Lal Son of Phool Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence

¶3

Application No.300/2021

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1115/2021

¶6

Amrat Lal Son of Phool, Resident Of Jhadoli, Police Station Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur)

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aslam S. Khan, for Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, P.P.

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶13

Order

¶14

16/11/2021

¶15

This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the applicant seeking suspension of his sentence.

¶16

Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant was convicted by the Trial Court vide its judgment dated 09.03.2021 for the offence under Section(s) 457 & 380 IPC and sentenced as under:-

¶17

For offence under Section 457 IPC- rigorous imprisonment of one year with a fine of Rs. 1,000/-; in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment of ten days.

¶18

For offence under Section 380 IPC- rigorous imprisonment of two years with a fine of Rs.1,000/-; in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment of ten days.

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[SOS-300/2021]

¶21

The appellant-applicant thereafter filed an appeal, but the appellate Court vide its judgment dated 21.09.2021 dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment passed by the Trial Court.

¶22

Learned counsel further submits that the accused applicant is in judicial custody since the order dated 21.09.2021. He has prayed that this application for suspension of sentence of the applicant may be allowed and sentence of the applicant may be suspended during the pendency of the petition.

¶23

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed same.

¶24

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and carefully scanned the entire material available on record, this suspension of sentence application filed by the applicant is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to accused applicant Amrat Lal S/o Phool by the Trial Court and affirmed by the Appellate Court shall remain suspended during the pendency of the petition, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) each before the concerned Trial Court to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 17^th December, 2021 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶25

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶26

DANISH USMANI /51

Amrat Lal Son of Phool v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amrat Lal Son of Phool v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lala Alias Lal Chand Gurjar Vs Mali Ram and Others

Lala Alias Lal Chand Gurjar Vs Mali Ram and Others

Dulichand and Others Vs Ganguram and Others

Abdul Hameed Son of Samda Ji Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagirath Machra S/O Shri Jugtaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit Gupta S/O Mahaveer Prasad Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan