Dismissed

Jai Narain Vyas University, v. Sunil Kumar Tak

Rajasthan HC13 Aug 2021SAW/171/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

University employees engaged through placement agencies sought regularization after 15–30 years of service. The Court upheld their entitlement to parity with similarly situated regularized employees and rejected objections concerning employment relationship, sanctioned posts and non-joinder of the State. The University's appeals against regularization with consequential benefits were dismissed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Jai Narain Vyas University, Vs Sunil Kumar Tak — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 347/2019

¶3

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Head Office, Residency Road, Jodhpur.

¶4

----Appellants

¶5

Versus

¶6

Mukesh Sharma S/o Shri Ram Swaroop Sharma, Resident Of Village Nosar, Tehsil Osian, Dist. Jodhpur, Presently Working As Chowkidar In the Engineering Hostel No. 8, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1759/2018

¶10

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶11

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur

¶12

----Appellants

¶13

Versus

¶14

Shera Tak (Miss) D/o Shri Om Prakash Tak, Aged About 45 Years, By Case Sen, 7/g-32, Kuri Housing Board, Jodhpur (Raj.)

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1791/2018

¶17

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶18

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶19

----Appellants

¶20

Versus

¶21

Harish Kumar Parihar S/o Shri Narsa Ram, Aged About 36 Years, By Category Sc, R/o C-182, Rameshwar Nagar, Basni, First Phase, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶22

----Respondent

¶23

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1853/2018

¶24

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶25

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

----Appellants

Versus

(2 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

Sampat Raj S/o Shri Mehra Ram, Aged About 34 Years, By Category Obc, R/o House No. 68, Rajeev Nagar, Basni 1St Phase, Kudi Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶31

----Respondent

¶32

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1857/2018

¶33

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶34

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶35

----Appellants

¶36

Versus

¶37

Vijay Singh Chouhan S/o Shri Bheru Singh, Aged About 49 Years, B/c Obc, 61 Nehru Colony, Ratanada, Jodhpur (Raj)

¶38

----Respondent

¶39

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1864/2018

¶40

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶41

----Appellants

¶42

Versus

¶43

Deva Ram S/o Shri Mehra Ram, Aged About 42 Years, By Category Obc, R/o House No. 68,l Rajeev Nagar, Basni First Phase, Kudi Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶44

----Respondent

¶45

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1865/2018

¶46

Jai Narain Vyas University Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶47

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur

¶48

----Appellants

¶49

Versus

¶50

Komal Singh Charan S/o Shri Hari Singh Charan, Aged About 35 Years, By Category Obc, A-419, Saraswati Nagar, Basni First Phase, Jodhpur (Raj.)

¶51

----Respondent

¶52

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1870/2018

¶53

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶54

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶55

----Appellants

¶56

Versus

¶57

Indra Singh S/o Shri Om Prakash, Aged About 38 Years, By Caste

¶58

(3 of 39)

¶59

[SAW-347/2019]

¶60

Rawna Rajput, R/o 139, Rawala Kot, Jhalamand, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶61

----Respondent

¶62

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1871/2018

¶63

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶64

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶65

----Appellants

¶66

Versus

¶67

Sunil Verma S/o Shri Prem Sukh Verma, Aged About 31 Years, By Category Obc, R/o Near Ganesh Chowk, Gandhiyon Ki Gali, City Police, Jodhpur (Raj.)

¶68

----Respondent

¶69

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1874/2018

¶70

Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶71

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶72

----Appellants

¶73

Versus

¶74

Pankaj Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Vinay Kumar Sharma, Aged About 47 Years, By Category General, R/o C-171, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶75

----Respondent

¶76

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1891/2018

¶77

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶78

----Appellant

¶79

Versus

¶80

Madho Singh S/o Shri Shaitan Singh, Aged About 38 Years, By Category Obc, R/o P. No. 60, Gulab Nagar C Sector C , B.j.s. Colony, Jodhpur (Raj.)

¶81

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶82

----Respondents

¶83

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1898/2018

¶84

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶85

----Appellant

¶86

Versus

¶87

Narendra Singh Chouhan S/o Shri Bheru Singh, Aged About 36 Years, By Category Obc R/o 61, Nehru Colony,

¶88

(4 of 39)

¶89

[SAW-347/2019]

¶90

Ratanada, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶91

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶92

----Respondents

¶93

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 1911/2018

¶94

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶95

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶96

----Appellants

¶97

Versus

¶98

Mahendra Singh Bhati S/o Shri Mal Singh Bhati, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste Rawana Rajput, House No. 63-F, Near New James School, Basni First Phase, Jodhpur (Raj.)

¶99

----Respondent

¶100

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 127/2019

¶101

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶102

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶103

----Appellants

¶104

Versus

¶105

Arjun Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Poona Ram, Aged About 50 Years, By Category Obc, R/o C/o Hari Ram Dudi, Plot No. 11, Kbh Road, Karni Nagar, Basni 1St Phase, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶106

----Respondent

¶107

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 133/2019

¶108

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶109

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶110

----Appellants

¶111

Versus

¶112

Virendra Sharma S/o Shri Omprakash Sharma, Aged About 41 Years, By Category General, R/o Vidhya Bhawan, Hakam Bagh, Opp. Sardar School, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶113

----Respondent

¶114

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 135/2019

¶115

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶116

Registrar, Jai Naraian Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶117

----Appellants

¶118

Versus

¶119

Baldev Ram S/o Shri Bagga Ram, Aged About 42 Years, By Caste

¶120

(5 of 39)

¶121

[SAW-347/2019]

¶122

Category Obc, R/o Village Nandra Kalla, Singdo Ki Dhani, District Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶123

----Respondent

¶124

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 138/2019

¶125

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶126

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶127

----Appellants

¶128

Versus

¶129

Manish Raney S/o Shri Nand Lal Raney, Aged About 32 Years, By Category General, R/o Meera Niwas, First C Road, Sardarpura, Opp. Azad Hind College Road, Jodhpur (Raj.)

¶130

----Respondent

¶131

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 163/2019

¶132

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar

¶133

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶134

----Appellants

¶135

Versus

¶136

Shrawan Ram Meghwal S/o Shri Baldev Ram, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Meghwal (Sc), R/o Meghwalon Ka Bas, Village And Post Khangata, Tehsil Pipar City, Dist. Jodhpur.

¶137

----Respondent

¶138

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 169/2019

¶139

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. Head Office, Residency Road, Jodhpur.

¶140

----Appellants

¶141

Versus

¶142

Dinesh Sharma S/o Shri Sohan Lal Sharma, Presently Working As Class Iv Employee/assistant Employee In The Office Of Mbm Engineering College And Board Of Sports, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶143

----Respondent

¶144

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 170/2019

¶145

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar. 2. Registar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

----Appellants

(6 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

Versus

Jai Narayan Sharma S/o Shri Chandra Shekhar Sharma, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Paharganj IInd Colony, Lalsagar, Mandore Road, Jodhpur.

¶151

----Respondent

¶152

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 171/2019

¶153

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶154

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶155

----Appellants

¶156

Versus

¶157

Sunil Kumar Tak S/o Shri Manohar Lal, Aged About 32 Years, By Caste Sen, R/o D-22, Rameshwar Nagar, Basni First Phase, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶158

----Respondent

¶159

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 221/2019

¶160

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶161

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶162

----Appellants

¶163

Versus

¶164

Prem Singh S/o Shri Mod Singh, Aged About 36 Years, By Caste Rawana Rajput, R/o- Village Gadav, Post- Karwar, Tehsil And Dist. Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶165

----Respondent

¶166

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 222/2019

¶167

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶168

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶169

----Appellants

¶170

Versus

¶171

Madan Singh S/o Shri Mod Singh, Aged About 40 Years, By Caste Rawana Rajput, R/o Village Gadav, Post Karwar, Tehsil And Dist. Jodhpur (Raj.)

¶172

----Respondent

¶173

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 241/2019

¶174

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶175

Director, University Science Instrumentation Centre, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

(7 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

----Appellants

Versus

Jagdish Prasad S/o Shri Kasi Ram, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Naya Talab, Moti Kund, Inside Nagauri Gate, Jodhpur.

¶181

----Respondent

¶182

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 243/2019

¶183

1.Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University,Jodhpur

¶184

----Appellant

¶185

Versus

¶186

Ganpat Singh S/o Shri Bagtawar Singh, Aged About 43 Years, By Caste Rawana Rajput, R/o 285, Hanuman Dhari, Guda Road, Jhalamand, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶187

----Respondents

¶188

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 244/2019

¶189

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶190

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶191

----Appellants

¶192

Versus

¶193

Jai Ram S/o Shri Bhoora Ram, Aged About 40 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Naya Bera, Village And Post Khangata, Teh. Pipar City, Dist. Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶194

----Respondent

¶195

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 245/2019

¶196

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶197

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶198

----Appellants

¶199

Versus

¶200

Narendra Kumar Bhatt S/o Shri S.p. Bhatt, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Bhatto Ka Vass, Bharampuri, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶201

----Respondent

¶202

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 247/2019

¶203

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶204

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur

----Appellants

(8 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

Versus

Narayan Ram S/o Shri Magna Ram, Aged About 58 Years, B/c Sen, 149, Nainon Ka Bas, Vpo Khabra Khurd, Tehsil Osian, Dist. Jodhpur (Raj).

¶210

----Respondent

¶211

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 251/2019

¶212

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶213

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶214

----Appellants

¶215

Versus

¶216

Rajendra Singh S/o Shri Matabux, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Opposite Baba Ramdeo Temple, Sanotshpura, Masuriya, Jodhpur. ----Respondent

¶217

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 278/2019

¶218

1. Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶219

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶220

----Appellants

¶221

Versus

¶222

Kavita Panwar Mrs. D/o Late Shri Bihari Singh Panwar, Aged About 39 Years, Category Obc, R/o Fort Road, Bagar Beri, Jodhpur.

¶223

----Respondent

¶224

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 304/2019

¶225

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶226

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶227

----Appellants

¶228

Versus

¶229

Ram Prakash S/o Shri Seeta Ram Faroda, Aged About 29 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Hanumanpura, Village And Post Khangata, Tehsil Pipar City, Dist. Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶230

----Respondent

¶231

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 305/2019

¶232

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶233

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

----Appellants

(9 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

Versus

Rajendra Singh S/o Shri Ajeet Singh, Aged About 36 Years, By Caste Category General, R/o- Makan No. 40, East Patel Nagar, Circuit House Road, Ratanada, Jodhpur.

¶239

----Respondent

¶240

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 306/2019

¶241

Jai Narain Vyas University,Jodhpur through

¶242

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶243

----Appellant

¶244

Versus

¶245

Murlidhar S/o Shri Rambux, Aged About 50 Years, By Caste Harijan, R/o 4/161, K.k. Colony, Basni 1St Phase, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶246

----Respondent

¶247

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 307/2019

¶248

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶249

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶250

----Appellants

¶251

Versus

¶252

Vijay Gaur S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Gaur, Aged About 43 Years, By Caste Gaur, R/o Meharon Ka Chowk, Naya Bas, Pipali Ki Gali, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶253

----Respondent

¶254

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 310/2019

¶255

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶256

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶257

----Appellants

¶258

Versus

¶259

Himmat Singh S/o Shri Ratan Singh, Aged About 28 Years, By Category Obc, R/o- D-94, Rameshwar Nagar, Basni 1St Phase, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶260

----Respondent

¶261

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 320/2019

¶262

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar

¶263

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

----Appellants

(10 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

Versus

Vimla (Mrs.) D/o Shri Aatma Ram, Aged About 38 Years, By Caste Harijan, R/o 262, Nehru Colony, Paanch Batti Circle, Jodhpur.

¶269

----Respondent

¶270

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 321/2019

¶271

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶272

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶273

----Appellants

¶274

Versus

¶275

Manish Pal Singh S/o Shri Rajendra Singh, Aged About 36 Years, By Category Obc, R/o 66-A, Opposite Dhandi School, Jhalamand, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶276

----Respondent

¶277

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 322/2019

¶278

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar

¶279

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶280

----Appellants

¶281

Versus

¶282

Kamlesh S/o Shri Aatma Ram, Aged About 37 Years, By Caste Harijan, R/o 262, Nehru Colony, Paanch Batti Circle, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶283

----Respondent

¶284

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 323/2019

¶285

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶286

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶287

----Appellants

¶288

Versus

¶289

Anand Singh Gehlot S/o Shri Babu Lal Gehlot, Age about 45 years, By Category Obc, R/o Soorsagar Thane Ke Pass, Chandpole Road, Jodhpur.

¶290

----Respondent

¶291

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 324/2019

¶292

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶293

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

----Appellants

(11 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

Versus

Narpat Kumar S/o Late Shri Pema Ram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Jawahar Colony, Sardar Club, Ratanada, Dist. Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶299

----Respondent

¶300

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 325/2019

¶301

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶302

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶303

----Appellants

¶304

Versus

¶305

Babu Lal S/o Shri Chunni Lal, Aged About 33 Years, By Caste Saragara, R/o. 41/4, Marusthali Awas Colony, Engg. Hostel, Residency Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶306

----Respondent

¶307

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 328/2019

¶308

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶309

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶310

----Appellants

¶311

Versus

¶312

Sanjani W/o Shri Ratan Singh, Aged About 42 Years, By Category Obc, R/o- D-94, Rameshwar Nagar, Basni First Phase, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶313

----Respondent

¶314

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 330/2019

¶315

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶316

----Appellants

¶317

Versus

¶318

Ramesh Vaishnav S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 44 Years, By Category Obc, R/o Sunaro Ki Bagechi, Ratanada, Jodhpur.

¶319

----Respondent

¶320

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 331/2019

¶321

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Naran Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶322

----Appellants

¶323

Versus

¶324

Sajjan Singh S/o Shri Lakh Singh, Aged About 28 Years, By

¶325

(12 of 39)

¶326

[SAW-347/2019]

¶327

Category General, R/o Village Post Bastwa, Tehsil Balesar, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶328

----Respondent

¶329

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 332/2019

¶330

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶331

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University Jodhpur.

¶332

----Appellants

¶333

Versus

¶334

Nirmala D/o Late Shri Prabhu Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 239, Nehru Colony, Panch Batti Road, Ratanada, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶335

----Respondent

¶336

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 333/2019

¶337

1. Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶338

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶339

----Appellants

¶340

Versus

¶341

Vikram Gharu S/o Shri Hari Ram, Aged About 36 Years, By Caste Harijan, R/o 257, Nehru Colony, Paanch Batti Circle, Jodhpur.

¶342

----Respondent

¶343

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 342/2019

¶344

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar 2. Registrar, Jai Naran Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶345

The Dean, Faculty Of Arts, Jai Naran Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶346

----Appellants

¶347

Versus

¶348

Vikas Parmar S/o Shri Ramesh Chandra Parmar, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Sargara, Resident Of Jagjeevan Ram Colony, Khetanadi, Mandore Road, Jodhpur.

¶349

----Respondent

¶350

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 344/2019

¶351

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶352

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

(13 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

----Appellants

Versus

Arjun Ram S/o Shri Ghevar Ram, Aged About 30 Years, By Caste Meghwal, R/o House No. 118, Jagdamba Colony, Pratap Nagar, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶358

----Respondent

¶359

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 350/2019

¶360

Jai Narain Vyas University Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶361

----Appellant

¶362

Versus

¶363

Deena Ram S/o Shri Mandroop Ram, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Khangta, Tehsil Pipad City, Dist. Jodhpur.

¶364

----Respondent

¶365

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 354/2019

¶366

Jai Narain Vyas University, through its Registrar 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas Unviersity, Jodhpur. Head Office, Residency Road, Jodhpur.

¶367

----Appellant

¶368

Versus

¶369

Tej Raj S/o Late Shri Kishan Lal, Resident Of Shanti Nagar, Masuriya Colony, Jodhpur- Presently Working As Lab Assistant In The Office Of Computer Science And Engineering Department, Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶370

----Respondent

¶371

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 356/2019

¶372

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶373

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶374

----Appellants

¶375

Versus

¶376

Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Gopa Ram Solanki, Aged About 31 Years, By Category Obc, R/o 56, Balaji Nagar, Salawas Road, Sangariya, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶377

----Respondent

¶378

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 360/2019

¶379

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶380

(14 of 39)

¶381

[SAW-347/2019]

¶382

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶383

----Appellants

¶384

Versus

¶385

Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Desha Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o- At Present L-213, B Railway Medical Colony, Old Loko, Dist. Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶386

----Respondent

¶387

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 361/2019

¶388

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶389

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶390

----Appellants

¶391

Versus

¶392

Madan Singh S/o Shri Mohan Singh, Aged About 44 Years, By Category Obc, R/o. 130, Ghanchi Colony, New Pali Road, Bhagat Ki Kothi, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶393

----Respondent

¶394

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 362/2019

¶395

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶396

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶397

----Appellants

¶398

Versus

¶399

Dilip Solanki S/o Late Shri Hari Singh Solanki, Aged About 26 Years, By Category Obc R/o Gali No. 5, Ram Chowk, Jaloriyon Ka Bas, Inside Nagori Gate, Jodhpur.

¶400

----Respondent

¶401

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 363/2019

¶402

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶403

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶404

----Appellants

¶405

Versus

¶406

Praveen S/o Shri Mangilal, Aged About 30 Years, By Category Sc, R/o., Ch-24, High Court Colony, Ratanada, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶407

----Respondent

¶408

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 375/2019

¶409

Jai Narain Vyas University Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶410

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. Head Office,

¶411

(15 of 39)

¶412

[SAW-347/2019]

¶413

Residency Road, Jodhpur.

¶414

----Appellants

¶415

Versus

¶416

Rajendra Singh S/o Shri Mool Singh, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Janta Colony, House No. 114, 1St Phase, Rameshwar Nagar, Jodhpur. Presently Working As Peon/chowkidar In The Health Care Centre, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶417

----Respondent

¶418

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 382/2019

¶419

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶420

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶421

----Appellants

¶422

Versus

¶423

Raj Kumari D/o Shri Jagdish Singh Deora, Aged About 47 Years, By Category General, R/o Pachetia Hilla, Navchowkia, Inside Jalori Gate, Jodhpur (Raj.)

¶424

----Respondent

¶425

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 387/2019

¶426

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶427

----Appellants

¶428

Versus

¶429

Pramod Singh S/o Shri Ram Singh, Aged About 28 Years, By Caste Rawana Rajput, R/o 137, Ravala Kot, Jhalamand, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶430

----Respondent

¶431

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 395/2019

¶432

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶433

----Appellants

¶434

Versus

¶435

Ashok Sen S/o Shri Mangi Lal Sen, Aged About 27 Years, By Category Obc, R/o Plot No. 446, Vaishnav Colony, Gali No. 11, Balaji Mandir Road, Chandna Bhakar, Jodhpur (Raj.).

----Respondent

(16 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 404/2019

¶440

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Vice Chancellor At Central Office, Jodhpur.

¶441

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶442

----Appellants

¶443

Versus

¶444

Sunil Kumar Ojha S/o Late Sh. Hari Lal Ji Ojha, By Caste Ojha, Resident Of Chand Baori, Navchokiya, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶445

----Respondent

¶446

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 411/2019

¶447

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶448

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶449

----Appellants

¶450

Versus

¶451

Dhan Raj S/o Shri Chandu Ram, Aged About 42 Years, By Caste Harijan, R/o 252, Nehru Colony, Paanch Batti Circle, Jodhpur.

¶452

----Respondent

¶453

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 419/2019

¶454

The Jai Narain Vyas University Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶455

----Appellant

¶456

Versus

¶457

Ram Prasad S/o Shri Babu Lalji Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, Mahamandir, Junibagar, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶458

----Respondent

¶459

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 442/2019

¶460

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶461

----Appellants

¶462

Versus

¶463

Jai Kanwar W/o Shri Dharmendra Singh Panwar, Aged About 36 Years, By Castegory Obc, R/o Plot No. 13, Gaj Kripa, Old Police Line, Rai Ka Bag, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶464

----Respondent

¶465

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 443/2019

¶466

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar

¶467

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas Unversity, Jodhpur.

(17 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

----Appellants

Versus

Vishnu Kumar S/o Shri Bankelal Prajapat, Aged About 31 Years, By Category Obc, R/o. Krashi Mandi Ke Piche, Maderna Colony, Pipli Chowk, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶473

----Respondent

¶474

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 449/2019

¶475

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur

¶476

----Appellant

¶477

Versus

¶478

Nemi Chand S/o Shri Ota Ram, Aged About 33 Years, By Category Sc, R/o C-156, Rameshwar Nagar, Basni 1St Phase, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶479

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶480

----Respondents

¶481

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 452/2019

¶482

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶483

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶484

----Appellants

¶485

Versus

¶486

Mohd. Hanif S/o Shri Abdul Hamid, Age about 43 years R/o Maderna Colony, Kayamkhanii Mohalla, Near Masjid, Bhadwasiya, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶487

----Respondent

¶488

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 454/2019

¶489

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶490

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶491

----Appellants

¶492

Versus

¶493

Sobhagmal Morya S/o Shri Suresh Chand, Aged About 47 Years, By Caste Category Sc, R/o 1101/21, Morya Bhawan, Peer Road, Diggi Bazar, Dist. Ajmer (Raj.).

¶494

----Respondent

¶495

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 455/2019

¶496

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶497

(18 of 39)

¶498

[SAW-347/2019]

¶499

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶500

----Appellants

¶501

Versus

¶502

Yogeshwar S/o Shri Om Prakash Chouhan, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Hathi Ram Ka Odha, Ranawat Mandir Ke Samene, Dist. Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶503

----Respondent

¶504

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 496/2019

¶505

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶506

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶507

----Appellants

¶508

Versus

¶509

Vandana Chouhan S/o Shri Pukhraj Chouhan, Aged About 37 Years, By Category Sc, R/o- House No. 72, Jawahar Colony, Near Sardar Club, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶510

----Respondent

¶511

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 497/2019

¶512

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶513

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶514

----Appellants

¶515

Versus

¶516

Sapna Koli D/o Shri Naval Kishore, Aged About 35 Years, By Caste Koli, R/o 355, Railway Quarters, Rpf Backside, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶517

----Respondent

¶518

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 498/2019

¶519

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar

¶520

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Head Office, Residency Road, Jodhpur.

¶521

----Appellants

¶522

Versus

¶523

Shrawan Kumar S/o Late Shri Pema Ram, Aged About 41 Years, By Caste Sargara, Presently Working As Class Iv Employee In Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Resident Of Plot No. 114, Jawahar Colony, Near Sardar Club, Dist. Jodhpur (Rajasthan)

¶524

Parmeshwar Singh S/o Shri Bodu Ram,, Aged About 39

¶525

(19 of 39)

¶526

[SAW-347/2019]

¶527

Years, By Caste Matwa, Presently Working As Chowkidar At Derashree Hospital, New Campus, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶528

Sujan Singh S/o Shri Chain Singh,, Aged About 34 Years, By Caste Rajput, Presently Working As Driver/peon In Confidential Branch, Head Office, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶529

Deepak Kumar S/o Shri Pema Ram,, Aged About 41 Years, Presently Working As Peon/chowkidar In Mining Wing, Mbm Engineering College, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶530

Rajendra Singh S/o Shri Takhat Singh,, Aged About 39 Years, By Caste Rajput, Presently Working As Chowkidar In Building Cell (Store), Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶531

Rameshwar Das S/o Shri Mangi Lal,, Age about 42 years, By Caste Vaishnav, Presently Working As Driver Cum Peon In Examination Section, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶532

Lal Singh S/o Shri Bodu Singh,, Aged About 44 Years, Presently Working As Peon Cum Chowkidar In Vice Chancellor Bungalow, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. ----Respondents

¶533

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 499/2019

¶534

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶535

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶536

----Appellants

¶537

Versus

¶538

Mahesh Ram S/o Shri Amra Ram, Aged About 28 Years, By Category Obc, R/o Haryana Konri, Agolai, Tehsil Balesar, Dist. Jodhpur.

¶539

----Respondent

¶540

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 500/2019

¶541

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Nrain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶542

----Appellants

¶543

Versus

¶544

Jitendra Verma S/o Shri Om Prakash Verma, Aged About 36

¶545

(20 of 39)

¶546

[SAW-347/2019]

¶547

Years, By Category Obc, R/o Backside Of Ramdev Mandir, Suthala, Chopasani Road, Jodhpur (Raj.)

¶548

----Respondent

¶549

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 523/2019

¶550

Jai Narayan Vyas University Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶551

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶552

----Appellants

¶553

Versus

¶554

Dr. Nirmal Tak S/o Shri Narendra Singh Tak, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Inside Nagori Gate, Vijay Chowk, Jodhpur.

¶555

----Respondent

¶556

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 549/2019

¶557

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶558

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶559

----Appellants

¶560

Versus

¶561

Mahendra Singh Mundel S/o Shri Hari Ram Mundel, Aged About 31 Years, By Category Obc, R/o Village Post Khangta, Tehsil Pipar City, Dist. Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶562

----Respondent

¶563

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 552/2019

¶564

Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶565

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Head Office, Residency Road, Jodhpur.

¶566

----Appellants

¶567

Versus

¶568

Parbat S/o Shri Babulal Siyota, Aged About 28 Years, House No. 988, Kheme Ka Kua, Near K.r. Public School, Pal Road, JodhpurPresently Working As Peon In The Office Of Electronic And Computer Engineering Department, Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶569

----Respondent

¶570

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 553/2019

¶571

Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶572

(21 of 39)

¶573

[SAW-347/2019]

¶574

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Head Office, Residency Road, Jodhpur.

¶575

----Appellants

¶576

Versus

¶577

Bharat Singh Chouhan S/o Shri Prahlad Singh Chouhan, Aged About 25 Years, House No. 64, Sector-F, Rameshwar Nagar, Near James School, Basni First Phase, Jodhpur- Presently Working As Peon/class-II Employee In The Office Of Electronic And Communications Engineering Department, Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶578

----Respondent

¶579

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 564/2019

¶580

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶581

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶582

----Appellants

¶583

Versus

¶584

Virendra Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Ramratan Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, By Caste Brahmin, Resident Of 8Th, Residency Road, House No. 11-A, Karmchari Colony, Jodhpur.

¶585

----Respondent

¶586

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 567/2019

¶587

Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶588

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶589

----Appellants

¶590

Versus

¶591

Kewal Chand S/o Shri Purkha Ram, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Sanjay Colony, Basni First Phase, Jodhpur.

¶592

----Respondent

¶593

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 572/2019

¶594

Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶595

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Head Office, Residency Road, Jodhpur.

¶596

----Appellants

¶597

Versus

¶598

Rajendra Singh S/o Late Shri Girdhari Singh, Aged About 33

¶599

(22 of 39)

¶600

[SAW-347/2019]

¶601

Years, Plot No. 69, Janta Colony, Rameshwar Nagar, JodhpurPresently Working As Peon In The Office Of Electronic And Communications Engineering Department, Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶602

----Respondent

¶603

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 577/2019

¶604

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶605

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶606

----Appellants

¶607

Versus

¶608

Manoj Singh S/o Shri Mala Ram, Aged About 29 Years, By Category Obc, R/o Village And Post Chitawa, Tehsil Kuchaman, Dist. Nagaur (Rajasthan).

¶609

----Respondent

¶610

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 605/2019

¶611

The Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶612

----Appellant

¶613

Versus

¶614

Mohammed Aslam S/o Atta Mohammed, Aged About 40 Years, R/ o Karnal Sahab Ki Haveli, Udai Mandir Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶615

----Respondent

¶616

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 761/2019

¶617

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶618

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶619

----Appellants

¶620

Versus

¶621

Alan Lawerence S/o Shri Zoey F. Franks, Aged About 42 Years, By Category General, R/o House No. 18, Nayapura, Lal Sagar Mandore, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶622

----Respondent

¶623

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 762/2019

¶624

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶625

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶626

----Appellants

¶627

Versus

¶628

Rajendra Bora S/o Shri Ram Krishna Bora, Aged About 54 Years,

¶629

(23 of 39)

¶630

[SAW-347/2019]

¶631

By Category General, R/o Near Boharon Ki Pole, Khanda Phalsa, Inside Jalori Gate, Jodhpur.

¶632

----Respondent

¶633

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 763/2019

¶634

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶635

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶636

----Appellants

¶637

Versus

¶638

Hitendra Parihar S/o Shri Thanchand Parihar, Aged About 29 Years, By Category Sc, R/o 73, Jawahar Colony, Opp. Polo Ground, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶639

----Respondent

¶640

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 764/2019

¶641

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶642

----Appellants

¶643

Versus

¶644

Harikishan Bohra S/o Shri Vishwambhar Lal Bohra, Aged About 48 Years, By Category General, R/o 94, Gayatri Nagar, Behind Latiyal Vatika, Pal Road, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶645

----Respondent

¶646

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 765/2019

¶647

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶648

----Appellants

¶649

Versus

¶650

Madan Lal S/o Shri Chandu Lal, Aged About 46 Years, By Caste Harijan, R/o 262, Nehru Colony, Paanch Batti Circle, Jodhpur.

¶651

----Respondent

¶652

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 766/2019

¶653

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar

¶654

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶655

----Appellants

¶656

Versus

¶657

Prakash Prajapat S/o Shri Sohan Lal Prajapat, Aged About 39 Years, By Category Obc, R/o Manak Chowk, Naya Bas, Ramdev Ji

¶658

(24 of 39)

¶659

[SAW-347/2019]

¶660

Ki Gali, Near Chitra Cinema, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶661

----Respondent

¶662

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 767/2019

¶663

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶664

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶665

----Appellants

¶666

Versus

¶667

Prem Singh S/o Late Shri Narayan Singh Daiya, Aged About 46 Years, By Category Obc, R/o- Plot No. 46, Bhagwan Nagar, Near Tagore School, Bjs, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶668

----Respondent

¶669

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 854/2019

¶670

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶671

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶672

----Appellants

¶673

Versus

¶674

Anand Singh S/o Shri Banshi Singh, Aged About 35 Years, By Caste Rajput, R/o Jhalamand Chouraya, House No. 60, Vayu Vihar Colony, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶675

----Respondent

¶676

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 856/2019

¶677

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶678

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶679

----Appellants

¶680

Versus

¶681

Madan Lal S/o Gulab Ram, Aged About 41 Years, By Category Sc, R/o Plot No.113, Jawahar Colony, Near Sardar Club, Residency Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶682

----Respondent

¶683

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 888/2019

¶684

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶685

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶686

----Appellants

¶687

Versus

¶688

Dalpat Singh S/o Shri Banshi Lal Chouhan, Aged About 44 Years,

¶689

(25 of 39)

¶690

[SAW-347/2019]

¶691

Resident Of Plot No. 9-B, Panchwati Colony, Ratanada, Jodhpur.

¶692

----Respondent

¶693

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 889/2019

¶694

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. Head Office, Residency Road, Jodhpur.

¶695

----Appellants

¶696

Versus

¶697

Chandar Singh S/o Shri Mangi Lal, Resident Of C-469, Saraswati Nagar, Basni 1St Phase, Jodhpur. Presently Working As Class Iv Employee/lab Assistant In The Office Of Faculty Of Computer Science And Engineering Department, Mbm Engineering College, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan).

¶698

----Respondent

¶699

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 890/2019

¶700

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar. 2. Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. Head Office, Residency Road, Jodhpur

¶701

----Appellants

¶702

Versus

¶703

Man Prakash S/o Shri Prem Prakash, Resident Of Servant Quarter No. 4, In Front Of Green Gate, Mbm Engineering College, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur. Presently Working As Chowkidar In The Office Of Production And Industrial Engineering, Faculty Of Engineering And Architecture, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶704

----Respondent

¶705

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 891/2019

¶706

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶707

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶708

----Appellants

¶709

Versus

¶710

Jitendra Singh S/o Shri Jhuth Singh, Age about 36 years, R/o C/o Mangilal Ji, H. No. 1, Near New Marwar Hotel, High Court Colony, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶711

----Respondent

¶712

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 892/2019

¶713

(26 of 39)

¶714

[SAW-347/2019]

¶715

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶716

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶717

----Appellants

¶718

Versus

¶719

Mohd. Ehesan S/o Late Nishar Ahmed, Resident Of Farashon Ka Mohalla, Moti Chowk, Jodhpur.

¶720

----Respondent

¶721

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 934/2019

¶722

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶723

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶724

----Appellants

¶725

Versus

¶726

Rajendra Singh S/o Shri Babu Singh, Aged About 42 Years, By Caste Rawana Rajput, R/o 309, Hanuman Dhari, Guda Road, Jhalamand, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶727

----Respondent

¶728

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 941/2019

¶729

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Jodhpur Through Its Registrar.

¶730

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶731

The Dean, Faculty Of Arts, Jai Narayan Vyas, University, Jodhpur.

¶732

----Appellants

¶733

Versus

¶734

Shanti Lal S/o Shri Bhagwan Ram, Aged About 43 Years, By Caste Sargara, Resident Of - Jagjeevan Ram Colony, Khetanadi, Mandore Road, Jodhpur (Jodhpur)

¶735

----Respondent

¶736

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 955/2019

¶737

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶738

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶739

----Appellants

¶740

Versus

¶741

Rajni W/o Shri Yashpal Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Plot No. Hudco Quarter, Sector E-170, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Jodhpur (Rajasthan)

(27 of 39)

[SAW-347/2019]

----Respondent

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 956/2019

¶746

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶747

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶748

The Dean, Faulty Of Engineer, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶749

----Appellants

¶750

Versus

¶751

Sohan Lal S/o Shri Narayan Das, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 365, Laxmi Nagar, Paota C Road, Jodhpur.

¶752

----Respondent

¶753

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 957/2019

¶754

Jai Narain Vyas University,jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.

¶755

Registrar, Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur.

¶756

----Appellants

¶757

Versus

¶758

Dinesh Bugasara S/o Shri Shankar Lal, Age about 30 years By Caste Jat, R/o Village Khorwa, Post Bhuwanda, Tehsil Kheevsar, Dist. Nagaur (Raj.).

¶759

----Respondent

¶760

D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 333/2020

¶761

The Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar

¶762

----Appellant

¶763

Versus

¶764

Sajjan Singh S/o Kan Singh, By Caste Rajput, R/o Bhatti Ki Bawdi, Chopasani Housing Board, Jodhpur. (Raj.).

¶765

----Respondent

¶766

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prithvi Raj Singh Jodha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Vyas, AAG assisted by Mr. Kailash Choudhary Dr. AA Bhansali Dr. Nikhil Dungawat Mr. Nihar Jain Mr. SKM Vyas

¶767

(28 of 39)

¶768

[SAW-347/2019]

¶769

Mr. Manoj Bhandari Mr. Govind Suthar Mr. Harish Purohit Mr. BS Sandhu Mr. R.S. Choudhary Mr. Firoz Khan Mr. Mohit Singh Choudhary

¶770

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. INDRAJIT MAHANTY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶771

Judgement Reserved on :- 10.08.2021 Judgment Pronounced on :- 13th.08.2021 (Per : Hon’ble Mr. Vinit Kumar Mathur,J.)

¶772

The defects pointed out by the Registry in some of the appeals are over-ruled.

¶773

In some of the appeals, applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act have been filed for condonation of delay.

¶774

For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same are allowed and the delay caused in filing the appeals is condoned.

¶775

The present batch of appeals led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1456/2016 Sunil Kumar Ojha vs. Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur arise out of the order dated 16.01.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge and other connected matters came to be decided on different dates by the learned Single Judge i.e. on 30.08.2018, 17.07.2018, 20.07.2018, 14.08.2018, 14.02.2019 & 14.11.2018. Since the common question of law and fact is involved in all these matters, as such, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

¶776

Brief facts which are required to be noted for deciding the controversy are that respondents-petitioners were appointed on different posts viz. Chowkidar/Peon, Book Attendant, LDC, Library Assistant, Junior Accountant, Accountant, Helper, Staff Nurse,

¶777

(29 of 39)

¶778

[SAW-347/2019]

¶779

Sweeper, Rakshak, Lab Bearer, Lab Attendant, Book Lifter, Security Guard, Matron, Driver/Peon, LDC cum Computer Operator in the appellant- Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur (hereinafter referred to as the ‘J.N.V University’) on different dates through the placement agency. Since, the respondents-petitioners had already put in almost 15-30 years of service, they requested for regularizing their services in the University but their services were not regularised.

¶780

In the year 1999, the meetings of the Sub-Committee constituted by the Vice Chancellor of the University were held on 22.03.1999 & 26.03.1999 for considering regularization of the services of six persons who were rendering their services in a similar fashion to the petitioners in the University on contractual/daily wage basis. The said Sub-Committee recommended for regularization of their services. The said recommendation was confirmed in a Meeting of the Syndicate dated 28.03.1999. Once again, the respondents-petitioners prayed for regularizing their services on the ground of parity in view of the decision taken by the Syndicate of the University on 28.03.1999 whereby six similarly situated employees were confirmed and were also granted regular pay scale. However, the same was not agreed to by the University.

¶781

It is noted that the University Administration vide its Notification dated 27.10.2017 sought information in a prescribed proforma from different departments regarding persons rendering the services on contract basis, probably with a view to regularise their services. However, when the grievances of the respondentspetitioners were not redressed, separate writ petitions were filed before this Court and the same were allowed by various Single

¶782

(30 of 39)

¶783

[SAW-347/2019]

¶784

Benches of this Court directing the appellant-University to regularize the services of the respondents-petitioners with all consequential benefits.

¶785

To complete the factual matrix, it is also relevant to mention that the writ petitions preferred by some of the employees were allowed by the learned Single Benches and the appeals preferred by the University against the same were also dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court. In some of the cases, even the Special Leave Petitions filed by the University before the Hon’ble Supreme Court were also dismissed. The details of the same are reproduced below in tabular form:-

¶786

1. JITENDRA KUMAR (PEON/CHOWKIDAR)

¶787

S.No	Type of Case	Case No.	Petitioner / Appellant Vs Respondent	Date of Decision	Status
1.	SBCWP	8660/2011	Jitendra Kumar Vs JNVU	13.12.2013	Allowed in favour of employee/petitioner
2.	DBSAW	354/2014	JNVU Vs Jitendra Kumar	18.07.2014	Appeal filed by Respondent University dismissed
3.	SLP	30831/2014	JNVU Vs Jitendra Kumar	24.11.2014	SLP filed by Respondent University dismissed
4.	WCP	84/2014	Jitendra Kumar Vs Mukesh Choudhary & Anr.	26.10.2016 21.11.2016	Contempt allowed appointment as well as arrear of payments of due given to the employee on 24.10.2016.

¶788

2. DR. VIKRANT SHARMA (LDC)

¶789

S.No	Type of Case	Case No.	Petitioner/ Appellant	Vs	Respondent	Date of Decision	Status
1.	SBCWP	375/2015	Dr. Vikrant Sharma	Vs	JNVU	03.08.2016	Allowed in favour of employee/petitioner
2.	DBSAW	7/2017	JNVU	Vs	Dr. Vikrant Sharma	21.02.2017	Appeal filed by Respondent University dismissed
3.	SLP	1534/2018	JNVU	Vs	Dr. Vikrant Sharma	09.04.2018	SLP filed by Respondent University before Supreme Court dismissed
4.	WCP	539/2017	Dr. Vikrant Sharma	Vs	Bhanwar Singh Sandu	19.07.2018 09.04.2021	Pending Appoint order dated 18.08.2018

¶790

3. DEEPAK DAVE (PEON)

¶791

S.N	Type of	Case No.	Petitioner/	Vs	Respondent	Date of	Status
o	Case		Appellant			Decision

¶792

(31 of 39)

¶793

[SAW-347/2019]

¶794

1.	SBCWP	13750/2015	Deepak Dave	Vs	JNVU	13.12.2017	Allowed in terms of Jitendra Kumar & appointment was given on 12.01.2018. No Appeal was filed by Respondent University Appointment order dated 12.01.2018
2.	WCP	601/2018	Deepak Dave	Vs	Pk Sharma & Anr.	01.05.2018	Pending

¶795

4. KHAMA RAM VISHNOI (ASSISTANT COORDINATOR)

¶796

5. PREM CHAND MEHTA (ASSISTANT CUM ACCOUNTANT)

¶797

6. NARENDRA SURANA (STENO CUM TYPIST)

¶798

S.No	Type of Case	Case No.	Petitioner/ Appellant	Vs	Respondent	Date of Decision	Status
1.	SBCWP	1316/2015 1317/2015 832/2015	Khama Ram Vishnoi Prem Chand Mehta Narendra Surana	Vs	JNVU	08.10.2018	Allowed in favour of employee/petitione r
2.	DBSAW	574/2019 574/2019 574/2019	JNVU	Vs	Khama Ram Vishnoi Prem Chand Mehta Narendra Surana	15.07.2019 07.08.2019 07.08.2019	Appeal filed by Respondent University dismissed
3.	SLP	11495/2020 8510/2020 11494/2020	JNVU	Vs	Khama Ram Vishnoi Prem Chand Mehta Narendra Surana	14.10.2020 18.08.2020 14.10.2020	SLP filed by Respondent University before Supreme Court dismissed
4.	WCP	406/2019 393/2019 468/2019	Khama Ram Vishnoi Prem Chand Mehta Narendra Surana	Vs	Ayub Khan	19.02.2021	Pending

¶799

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶800

Mr. P.R. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant-University vehemently submitted that the orders passed by the learned Single Judge are unjust, improper and incorrect as the respondents-petitioners were given appointment through the placement agency and as such, there was no master-servant relationship between the appellant-University and the respondents-petitioners. Thus, there was no question for the appellant-University to regularize the services of the respondents-

¶801

(32 of 39)

¶802

[SAW-347/2019]

¶803

petitioners, more so, when the placement agency was not arrayed as party respondent. He further contended that there was a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the University and the State which provides that the State is the final authority for creation of posts and filling up the vacancies and since the State was not arrayed as party respondent in the writ petitions, the writ petitions are liable to be dismissed on the ground of non-joinder of parties also.

¶804

Learned counsel for the appellant-University argued that the respondents-petitioners were employed through placement agency, therefore, they cannot be termed as the employees of the appellant-University and there was no question of regularizing their services on the posts as mentioned above. In support of his contentions, he relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Rajasthan vs. Dayalal reported in (2011) 2 SCC 429 .

¶805

The learned counsel implored the Court that the case of Dr. Vikrant Sharma vs. Jai Narayan Vyas University decided on 03.08.2016 is having no similarity with the case of the present respondents-petitioners as Dr. Vikrant Sharma – petitioner therein was appointed by the University and not through the contractor/placement agency and, therefore, the learned Single Judge fell in error while considering the case of respondentspetitioners on the ground of parity with the case of Dr. Vikrant Sharma. Learned counsel further submitted that the respondentspetitioners were not appointed on the sanctioned strength of posts and since they were appointed beyond the sanctioned strength of the regular employees, their case cannot be considered for regularization. He argued that while deciding the case of Deepak

¶806

(33 of 39)

¶807

[SAW-347/2019]

¶808

Dave (supra) , the learned Single Judge did not correctly apply the law laid down in the case of Ramavtar Sharma and Ors. vs. RSRTC and Ors. reported in 2015 (2) WLC (Raj) 112 and instead relied upon the judgment rendered in the case of Jitendra Kumar vs. Jai Narayan Vyas University decided on 13.12.2013.

¶809

Shri P.R. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant-University vehemently argued that in the case of State of Bihar vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad and Ors., the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that observations made in the case of State of Karnataka vs. Uma Devi cannot be made applicable in every case and, therefore, the learned Single Judge fell in error while giving a direction of regularization to the appellant-University in the present case.

¶810

The applications preferred by the State of Rajasthan for impleading as party-respondent were allowed. Shri Manish Vyas, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State of Rajasthan adopted the arguments of the learned counsel for the appellant-University and submits that the learned Single Judge committed an error while passing the order of regularization in favour of the respondents-petitioners.

¶811

Per contra, the learned counsels appearing for the respondents-petitioners supported the judgment delivered by the learned Single Bench in their favour on the ground that respondents-petitioners are serving the appellant-University for almost 15-30 years on different posts. They submitted that the respondents-petitioners are rendering their services for such a long period shows that there is a perennial nature of work and the University is functioning in full vigour and strength, therefore, not regularizing the services of the respondents-petitioners, is nothing but jeopardizing their future and livelihood as the sword of

¶812

(34 of 39)

¶813

[SAW-347/2019]

¶814

disengagement and termination will always hang on their head. They further submitted that not regularizing the services of the respondents-petitioners is not only unfair and unreasonable but, the same can be termed as unfair labour practice also.

¶815

The learned counsels have further submitted that the continuance of the respondents-petitioners in service for almost 15-30 years shows that University is not only in need of their services, but their services have also been found to be satisfactory. They submitted that the appellant-University regularized the services of similarly placed employees way back in the year 1999 and thereafter, different judgments have been passed in the case of the similarly situated employees. Learned counsel, therefore, submitted that on the same lines, relief may be extended to the respondents-petitioners and the appeals may be dismissed as has been done in the cases of Jitendra Kumar, Vikrant Sharma, Khema Ram Bishnoi, Premchand Mehta and Narendra Surana.

¶816

It is further submitted that challenge to the Division Bench judgments passed by this Court have been rejected by Hon’ble the Supreme Court as the Special Leave Petitions filed by the appellant-University have been dismissed. They submitted that the University took up the matter by collecting the information of the respondents-petitioners for regularization, but the same has not been culminated into the orders passed for regularization in their cases. Learned counsel have relied upon the judgments passed by this Court for extending the similar benefits in their cases. They also relied upon the judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of Narendra Kumar Tiwari and Ors. vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors. AIR 2018 SC 358, Vice Chancellor, Lucknow University,

¶817

(35 of 39)

¶818

[SAW-347/2019]

¶819

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh vs. Akhilesh Kumar Khare and Anr. AIR 2015 SC 347, ONGC Ltd. vs. Petroleum Coal Labour Union and Ors. AIR 2015 SCW 2866, Amarkant Rai vs. State of Bihar AIR 2015 SC (supp.) 1229, Sheo Narian Nagar and Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. AIR 2018 SC 233.

¶820

We have heard learned counsel for the parties, considered the submissions made at the Bar and have gone through the pleadings, written submissions as well as the judgments relied upon by the counsel for the parties.

¶821

The admitted facts in the present case are that appellant – (Jodhpur University, erstwhile) now Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur was established in the year 1962 and even today thousands of students are enrolled and undergoing studies in different disciplines. The respondents-petitioners were appointed on different posts as mentioned above on different dates and they are still serving the appellant-University till date. Most of the respondents-petitioners have rendered almost 15-30 years of service. It is also worth noticing that services of some of the similarly situated employees were regularized by the University in the year 1999. Since the University itself had taken up the cases for regularization of some of the employees on its own, therefore, there is no reason for the appellant-University in not extending the same benefit in the case of respondents-petitioners. We also note that the respondents-petitioners are serving the appellantUniversity for a considerable period of time (almost 15-30 years) and the sword of uncertainty cannot be allowed to hang on their head.

¶822

The learned counsel for the appellant-University failed to distinguish the case of the present respondents-petitioners from

¶823

(36 of 39)

¶824

[SAW-347/2019]

¶825

the cases of the persons in whose favour, the judgments have been rendered by this Court and against the said judgments, Special Leave Petitions have also been rejected by Hon’ble the Supreme Court. It is also noticed that the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant-University were already taken note of by this Court in the earlier judgments and, therefore, there is no reason for us to take a different view in the present batch of appeals. The learned Single Judge rightly held that the respondents-petitioners are entitled to the same relief as extended in favour of Jitendra Kumar and Ors.

¶826

Learned counsel for the appellant-University submitted that there is no direct relationship between the respondents-petitioners and the University. It is noticed that the respondents-petitioners are directly serving under the University administration and they are directly under the command and control of the appellantUniversity. The continuance of respondents-petitioners in service for a period of 15-30 years shows the perennial nature of work and since there are no complaints/adverse remarks pointed out by the appellant-University against respondents-petitioners, it can be deemed that the services rendered by the respondents-petitioners are satisfactory. Thus, we are of the view that even as per the judgment of the Constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. vs. Uma Devi & Ors. reported in AIR 2006 SC 1806 , the services of the respondents-petitioners are liable to be regularized.

¶827

As far as the argument with respect to the number of persons working in the University on contractual/daily wage basis is outnumbering the sanctioned posts in the University is concerned, Mr. Singh frankly submitted that services of the

¶828

(37 of 39)

¶829

[SAW-347/2019]

¶830

respondents-petitioners are being utilized by them without an exception which shows that there is sufficient amount of work to justify the appointment of the respondents-petitioners.

¶831

On a pointed query being raised to the counsel for the appellant, he submitted that no disciplinary proceeding is pending against any of the respondents-petitioners and their conduct is found to be satisfactory.

¶832

The argument of the learned counsel for the appellantUniversity of non-joinder of the State of Rajasthan as party respondent is noted to be rejected for the reason that in some of the cases, the State of Rajasthan has been arrayed as respondent. Even otherwise, it is the responsibility of the appellant-University to take necessary sanction/clearance from the State of Rajasthan for regularization of the respondents-petitioners as their services are being utilized in the University for almost 2-3 decades. The judgments relied upon by the learned counsel are clearly distinguishable on the facts of the present case as the similarly situated persons have been regularized by the University and in other cases, this Court has already pronounced the judgments by various orders which have been affirmed by the Division Bench and also by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

¶833

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Arvind Kumar Srivastava (2015) 1 SCC 347 was pleased to observed as under :-

¶834

22.1. The normal Rule is that when a particular set of employees is given relief by the court, all other identically situated persons need to be treated alike by extending that benefit. Not doing so would amount to discrimination and would be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. This principle

¶835

(38 of 39)

¶836

[SAW-347/2019]

¶837

needs to be applied in service matters more emphatically as the service jurisprudence evolved by this Court from time to time postulates that all similarly situated persons should be treated similarly. Therefore, the normal Rule would be that merely because other similarly situated persons did not approach the Court earlier, they are not to be treated differently.

¶838

22.2. However, this principle is subject to wellrecognised exceptions in the form of laches and delays as well as acquiescence. Those persons who did not challenge the wrongful action in their cases and acquiesced into the same and woke up after long delay only because of the reason that their conterparts who had approached the court earlier in time succeeded in their efforts, then such employees cannot claim that the benefit of the judgment rendered in the case of similarly situated persons be extended to them. They would be treated as fence-sitters and laches and delays, and/or the acquiescence, would be a valid ground to dismiss their claim.

¶839

22.3. However, this exception may not apply in those cases where the judgment pronounced by the court was judgment in rem with intention to give benefit to all similarly situated persons, whether they approached the court or not. With such a pronouncement the obligation is cast upon the authorities to itself extend the benefit thereof to all similarly situated persons. Such a situation can occur when the subject-matter of the decision touches upon the policy matters, like scheme of regularization.”

¶840

We are also of the view that since the similarly situated persons have already been extended the benefit of regularization, the University should have taken up the cases of the respondentspetitioners on its own and as a model employer if a judgment has been pronounced by a Court of law, then the persons who are similarly situated and working in the organization should not be dragged in the Courts of law by not extending the same benefits

¶841

(39 of 39)

¶842

[SAW-347/2019]

¶843

as the employer is under an obligation to extend the same benefit to those persons who have not even approached the Court of law.

¶844

Our opinion in the preceding para is fortified by the observations of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in somewhat similar case titled as Vice Chancellor, Anand Agriculture University vs. Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 4443 of 2021) decided on 26.07.2021 has also held as under:-

¶845

13. By an order dated 17.10.2011, persons similarly situated to the Respondents were absorbed by being given the benefit of regularization. The Division Bench of the High Court has taken note of the discriminatory approach of the university in conferring the benefit of regularization to some and not to all those daily wagers who are eligible. There is no error in the judgment of the High Court which warrants interference by this Court. Eligible daily wagers in accordance with the scheme have been eagerly awaiting regularization as per the judgment of this Court in Gujarat Agricultural University’s case (supra). The right of the Respondents for regularization has been correctly recognized by the High Court.

¶846

In view of the discussions made above, we find no infirmity in the orders passed by the learned Single Benches. The appeals, being bereft of merit, are hereby dismissed.

¶847

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶848

(INDRAJIT MAHANTY),CJ

¶849

083-184-/praveenVivek/-

Jai Narain Vyas University, v. Sunil Kumar Tak

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Jai Narain Vyas University, v. Sunil Kumar Tak

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ex Directoradmn R S R T C and Anr. Vs Hakim Mohd and Anr.

Kalbeliya Samaj Takatgarh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Gram Panchayat Dhegana through Sarpanch Vs State of Rajasthan

Jai Narain Vyas University,Jodhpur Vs Dinesh Sharma

Jai Narain Vyas University,Jodhpur Vs Shrawan Ram Meghwal

Jai Narain Vyas University,Jodhpur Vs Jai Narayan Sharma