Counsel for the petitioner submitted that an appointment was already given, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The court allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 76/2015
Mukesh Kumari D/o Shri Sajjan Kumar, Village Dhaka Ki Dhani, Post Teetanwad, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer, Through Its Secretary
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mehla For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
07/07/2021
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already been given appointment by the respondent(s).
Hence, this writ petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the application for withdrawal of the writ petition is allowed.
This writ petition is dismissed, as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
CHARU SONI /129
Mukesh Kumari D/o Shri Sajjan Kumar
Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
