The High Court noted discrepancies in the final answer key compared to the model answer key, citing a Supreme Court decision. The court referred the matter to the RPSC to form a special expert committee to examine the issue without final interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 638/2021
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Meena, AAG with Mr. Rahul Sehra Mr. M F Baig
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Order
17/02/2021
(2 of 2)
[CW-638/2021]
SAURABH YADAV /670/69
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere when discrepancies are alleged in the final answer key of a recruitment exam due to changes from the model answer key.
Whether candidates were given a reasonable opportunity to object to the final answer key before the recruitment process concluded.
Whether the Rajasthan Public Service Commission should form a special expert committee to examine discrepancies in the answer key.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vikesh Kumar Gupta & Anr. versus State of Rajasthan & Ors. (2020) 13 SCALE 689Referred¶19
Kamal Yadav
Dharmi Chand
Mankor Devi Gurjar
The State Of Rajasthan
Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner
Rajasthan Public Service Commission
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
