Counsel for respondents submitted the petitioner had retired, rendering the writ infructuous; the court dismissed the petition accordingly.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 581/2019
Doulat Singh S/o Late Shri Narayan Singh, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Village Maharoli, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Pathak. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order
15/07/2021
Counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner has already retired from service on attaining age of superannuation, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
MG/43
DOULAT SINGH
AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD.
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
