Prasannajeet Singh Sankhla v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court permitted the withdrawal of state writ petitions, dismissing them as withdrawn without adjudication on merits.
High Court permitted the withdrawal of state writ petitions, dismissing them as withdrawn without adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5106/2019
Prasannajeet Singh Sankhla S/o Kushjeet Singh Sankhla, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Mayli Mandawatan, Opposite Secondary School No. 2, Mandore, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5107/2019
Abhishek Gelhot S/o Late Surendra Singh Gehlot, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Mayli Mandawatan, Opposite Secondary School No. 2, Mandore, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. CS Kotwani |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. Vikas Balia Mr. DS Jasol |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
06/12/2021
Counsel for the petitioner submits that statute in-question itself is under challenge.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioners are challenging the same, they have a right to adjudicate in relation to merit as well as statute and, thus, the writ petitions may be permitted to be withdrawn.
(2 of 2)
[CW-5106/2019]
The prayer is allowed.
Consequently, the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to take up all their issues, while challenging the statute.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
136-137-nirmala/-
Prasannajeet Singh Sankhla
Abhishek Gelhot
State Of Rajasthan
M/s. Dev Dashrath Mining And Toll L.l.p.
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court