The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the State against the Board of Revenue. The court held that revenue authorities recorded concurrent findings that the respondent was in cultivatory possession and the impugned cancellation order lacked factual basis.
The writ petition was dismissed and the stay application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 388/2020
State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar Pachpadra, District Barmer.
----Petitioner
Versus
Chokharam S/o Harjiram, By Caste Nai, Resident Of Jasol, Tehsil Pachpadra, District Barmer.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Loon Karan Purohit : Mr. Rajesh Panwar
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
08/12/2021
(2 of 3)
[CW-388/2020]
(3 of 3)
[CW-388/2020]
Revenue Appellate Authority has erred in allowing the respondent’s appeal and condoning the delay and the Board of Revenue has also erred in affirming the same.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
173-Rahul/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court is warranted in interfering with the order of the Board of Revenue dismissing the second appeal against the cancellation of land allotment.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar Pachpadra, District Barmer
Chokharam S/o Harjiram
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
