The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed this writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner had taken voluntary retirement from service, which rendered the relief sought unnecessary.
None granted; petition dismissed as infructuous due to petitioner's voluntary retirement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3819/2019
Vijay Fageria S/o Shri Taru Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Quarter No. 1302, Shq, Bsf, Bikaner (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Sharma. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Sandhu.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
01/10/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to subsequent developments, whereby the petitioner has taken voluntary retirement from service, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
145-Rmathur/-
Vijay Fageria
Union Of India
Director General, Border Security Force
Special Director General (Western Command), Border Security Force
Dy. Inspector General, Border Security Force
ARUN BHANSALI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
