Allowed

Mukesh Khandelwal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Mar 2021CW/3434/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by an employee seeking transfer to a location where his wife is posted. The Court directed respondents to consider the pending representation sympathetically in light of government policy, granting three weeks to pass a speaking order.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to sympathetically consider petitioner's pending representation based on state policy; allowed three weeks for decision via speaking order.

Mukesh Khandelwal Vs State of Rajasthan — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3434/2021

¶3

Mukesh Khandelwal S/o Late Shri Kanhaiyalal Ji, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Near Telephone Exchange, Ajmer Road, Degana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶7

The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner (Raj.)

¶8

The Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Zone Nagaur (Raj.)

¶9

The District Education Officer, Secondary, Nagaur (Rajasthan)

¶10

The Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School Degana, District Nagaur.

¶11

Shri Rameshwar Lal Jat, School Lecturer, Govt. Senior Secondary School, Degana, District Nagaur.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yash Pal Khileree. For Respondent(s) :

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

¶15

Order

¶16

01/03/2021

¶17

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to post the petitioner to place where his wife, who is in Government service is posted.

¶18

Various submissions have been made in the writ petition including submission that it is the policy of the State Government to post the husband and wife at the same station and at the place where the petitioner seeks transfer, there are vacant positions.

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CW-3434/2021]

¶21

In view of the submissions, which have been made in the petition and the fact that the petitioner’s representation is already pending with the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to sympathetically consider the representation made by the petitioner based on the policy of the State Government.

¶22

The petitioner would be free to file a fresh representation along with the certified copy of the order instant. If such a fresh representation is made, the same may be considered by the respondents objectively and decide the same by a speaking order within a period of three weeks from the date a copy of this order along with writ petition/representation is placed before the respondents.

¶23

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶24

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶25

67-pradeep/-

Mukesh Khandelwal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Khandelwal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rameshwar Lal Vs Lrs of Bhanwar Lal

Prakash Bhati Vs R.S.I.D and Investment Corp. Ltd. and Anr.

Chain Singh Vs Sabal Singh

Ghewar Ram Vishnoi Vs State of Rajasthan

Priyanka Kameriya Vs State of Rajasthan

Pukhraj Vs Rajasthan Public Service Comm. Ajmer