This order dismisses a writ petition as abated. The court allowed an application seeking dismissal on the ground that the petitioner failed to avail legal remedies within the limitation period.
The application to dismiss the writ petition as abated was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3357/2001
Rajiv Kachhwaha
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akhilesh Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajat Rajpurohit
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
12/08/2021
The application (IA No.01/18) preferred on behalf of the petitioner with a prayer to dismiss the present writ petition as abated in absence of availing legal remedies within the limitation, is considered and allowed.
Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as abated.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
110-Arun/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable after the expiry of limitation for approaching the court.
Rajiv Kachhwaha
State And Ors
Vijay Bishnoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
