Disposed

Alldeen Khatri v. the Union of India

Rajasthan HC25 Nov 2021CW/3011/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This discharge order addressed a limited grievance regarding unpaid deposits in a closed cooperative society. The petitioners prayed for the release of their deposited amounts. The High Court directed the respondents to take a decision expeditiously within 90 days.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondents to decide on petitioners' claim application for released deposits within 90 days.

Alldeen Khatri Vs the Union of India — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3011/2020

¶4

Alldeen Khatri S/o Gafur Khan, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Bhopalgar, Tehsil And District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

¶5

Kishori Lal Sen S/o Ratan Lal Sen, Aged About 63 Years, Caste- Sen, R/o Badla Ka Bas, Goshala Ke Pas, Kuchaman City, Nawa, Nagaur (Raj.).

¶6

Santosh Sain W/o Kishori Lal, Aged About 56 Years, Caste - Sain, R/o Badla Ka Bas, Goshala Ke Pas, Kuchaman City, Nawa, Nagaur (Raj.).

¶7

Rekha Sen W/o Amit Harshwal, Aged About 32 Years, Caste - Sen, R/o Near Saini Mandir, Opposite Sk Collage Ward No. 34, Sikar (Raj.).

¶8

Renu Sen W/o Rameshwar Lal, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Sen, R/o Naiyo Ka Bas, Gram - Deh. Tehsil - Jayal, District Nagaur (Raj.).

¶9

Mamta Sen D/o Kishori Lal, Aged About 29 Years, Caste - Sen, R/o Badla Ka Bas, Goshala Ke Pas, Kuchaman City, Nawa, Nagaur. (Raj.).

¶10

Kishan Lal Dhua S/o Trilok Chand, Aged About 50 Years, Caste- Dhua, R/o Ward 19, Nanak Colony, Shri Vijaynagar, Sribijay Nagar, District Ganganagar (Raj.).

¶11

Bindu W/o Kishan Lal, Aged About 43 Years, Caste - Dhua, R/o Ward No. 19, Guru Nanak Colony, Shri Vijaynagar, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).

¶12

Komal Dua D/o Kishan Lal, Aged About 22 Years, Caste - Dhua, R/o Ward No. 19, Guru Nanak Colony, Shri Vijaynagar, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).

¶13

Deva Ram Jakhar S/o Sukha Ram Jhakhar, Aged About 65 Years, Caste Jakhar, R/o Ward No. 2, Shri Vijaynagar, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).

¶14

Hulash Chand Sharma S/o Mukan Lal, Aged About 61 Years, Caste - Sharma,, R/o Ward No. 20, Vikas Nagar, Shri Vijaynagar, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).

¶15

Mamta Vya W/o Ravindra Kumar, Aged About 29 Years, Caste- Vya, R/o 107 Bhairav Gali, Ward No. 14, Bhinder, Udaipur (Raj.).

¶16

Lalit Kumar S/o Heera Lal, Aged About 46 Years, Caste -

¶17

(2 of 4)

¶18

[CW-3011/2020]

¶19

Vya, R/o Bhairav Gali, Mochiwada, Sarangpura, Bhinder, Udaipur (Raj.).

¶20

Mena Devi W/o Hira Lal, Aged About 75 Years, Caste - Vya, R/o Bhairav Gali, Mochiwada, Sarangpura, Bhinder, Udaipur (Raj.).

¶21

Ravindra Kumar Vya S/o Hira Lal, Aged About 44 Years, Caste - Vya, R/o Bhairav Gali, Mochiwada, Sarangpura, Bhinder, Udaipur (Raj.).

¶22

Bhagwati Devi Bandhu W/o Dharamendra, Aged About 56 Years, Caste - Bandhu, R/o Devashish, Reti Mohalla, Rajsamand (Raj.).

¶23

Bhavika Bandhu D/o Dharemendra, Aged About 31 Years, Caste - Bandhu, R/o Devashish, Reti Mohalla, Rajsamand (Raj.).

¶24

Dharemendra Bandhu S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 58 Years, Caste - Bandhu, R/o Reti Mohalla, Kankroli, Rajsamand (Raj.).

¶25

Vinod Chordiya S/o Arjun, Aged About 51 Years, CasteChordiya, R/o Indra Marg, Naya Road, Nathdwara, Rajsamand (Raj.).

¶26

Urmila Chordiya W/o Vinod, Aged About 46 Years, Caste - Chordiya, R/o Indra Marg, Naya Road, Nathdwara, Rajsamand (Raj.).

¶27

Bansti Soni D/o Bhanwar Lal Soni, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Pratap Bazar, Hanuman Road, Opposite To Janana Hospital, Ranikhurd, Tehsil Rani, District Pali Rajasthan.

¶28

Mal Singh Sisodia S/o Suraj Bhan Singh, Aged About 65 Years, R/o 66 Akhaliya Choraha, Barkattula Khan Colony, Jodhpur Rajasthan.

¶29

Prem Lata Sisodia W/o Mal Singh, Aged About 65 Years, R/o 66 Akhaliya Choraha, Barkattula Khan Colony, Jodhpur Rajasthan.

¶30

Sweety Soni D/o Suran Karan Soni, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village And Post Rani, District Pali.

¶31

----Petitioners

¶32

Versus

¶33

The Union Of India, Through Its Joint Secretary (Co-Op) And Central Registrar, Room No. 244, Department Of Agriculture, Cooperation And Farmers Welfare, Ministry Of

¶34

(3 of 4)

¶35

[CW-3011/2020]

¶36

Agriculture And Farmers Welfare, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.

¶37

Superintendent Of Police, Sog And Ats, Office Of The Special Operation Group Rajasthan Police, Jaipur - Delhi National Highway, Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶38

The Registrar, Rajasthan Co-Operative Societies, Nehru Sahakar Bhawan, C-Scheme, Road, Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶39

Navjeevan Credit Cooperative Society Limited, (MultiState) Through Its Managing Director/chief General Manager, Registered And Head Office High School Road, Barmer, Rajasthan.

¶40

----Respondents

¶41

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Girish Sankhala
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, AAG
	Mr. MrigrajSingh Rathore

¶42

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

¶43

Order

¶44

25/11/2021 (Amended vide order dated 29.06.2022)

¶45

IA No.3/2021 :

¶46

For the reasons stated, the application seeking preponement of the date is allowed.

¶47

The matter is taken up for consideration today itself.

¶48

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3011/2020 :

¶49

The limited grievance that the petitioners have raised in this case is that they had made certain deposits in the respondent No.4 – Navjeevan Credit Cooperative Society Limited under various schemes and heads, however, subsequently the respondent No.4 Establishment has been closed and a Liquidator was also appointed.

¶50

(4 of 4) [CW-3011/2020]

¶51

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that meanwhile the deposits of other creditors were released, however, the deposits made by the petitioners were not released. The petitioners make a limited prayer that the respondents may be directed to take a decision on the claim application of the petitioners seeking for release of the amount lying deposited with the respondent No.4.

¶52

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to take a decision on the application filed by the petitioners expeditiously preferably within a period of ninety days from the date of receipt of copy of this order strictly in accordance with rules and guidelines.

¶53

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

¶54

Stay application so also interlocutory application(s) stand disposed of accordingly.

¶55

(DINESH MEHTA),J

¶56

140-Ramesh/-

Alldeen Khatri v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alldeen Khatri v. the Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brij Mohan Vs State of Rajasthan

Sundar Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Pradeep Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Sushil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Raman Lal Bhatiya Vs Union of India

Ravindra Vs Heera Singh