The single judge allowed the writ petition and quashed the order refusing to accept the petitioner's written statement in the underlying suit, noting that the written statement along with costs had been filed and accepted.
The impugned order refusing to accept the written statement is quashed and set aside; the writ petition is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2541/2020
Shambhu Singh S/o Shri Dau Singh, Aged About 58 Years, By Caste Rajput, Resident Of Tabela, Inside Jalam Vilas, Paota B Road, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
M/s. Padmawati Art Creation Pvt. Ltd., Registered Office 401, Olympic Complex, Mgh Road, Jodhpur Through Authorised Director Abhinav Kumbhat S/o Shri Gautam Kumbhat, Resident Of Raikabagh, Jodhpur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. O.P. Sangwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. O.P. Mehta
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
01/12/2021
(2 of 2)
[CW-2541/2020]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
179 -Rahul/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed and the impugned order refusing to accept the written statement should be quashed.
Shambhu Singh
M/s. Padmawati Art Creation Pvt. Ltd.
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
