Dismissed

Bhoovnesh Kumar Chaudhary Son of Shri Vijay Singh Chaudhary v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Sept 2021CW/2350/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition concerning pay fixation and seniority benefits, the Court allowed the early listing, admitted the matter, and disposed of the petition by issuing a direction identical to a precedent, mandating the respondents to decide the petitioner's representation within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directions to the State to decide the petitioner's representation regarding pay fixation and seniority within three months.

Bhoovnesh Kumar Chaudhary Son of Shri… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2350/2019

¶3

Bhoovnesh Kumar Chaudhary Son Of Shri Vijay Singh Chaudhary, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Vpo Kheri, Tehsil Ramgarh, District Alwar.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. K. Goyal. For Respondent(s) :

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

¶11

Order

¶12

17/09/2021

¶13

Application for early listing is allowed.

¶14

The matter is taken up for admission.

¶15

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondents to make pay fixation of the petitioner equal to the similarly situated Teachers having been selected in the same selection process while stepping up the pay of the petitioner equal to him and that the petitioner may be granted benefit of seniority, promotion and other consequential benefits.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in similar nature writ petition being Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writs No.12109/2018 , decided on 18.07.2018 on the submissions made by counsel the

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-2350/2019]

¶19

respondents have been directed to decide the representation made by the petitioner therein and, therefore, a similar direction may be granted in the present case.

¶20

In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with similar direction as given in the case of Nand Kishore Sharma (supra), wherein, it was directed as under:-

¶21

“In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.”

¶22

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶23

(ARUN BHANSALI),J

¶24

106-SACHIN KHUSHWAHA /685

Bhoovnesh Kumar Chaudhary Son of Shri Vijay Singh Chaudhary v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhoovnesh Kumar Chaudhary Son of Shri Vijay Singh Chaudhary v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumari Suman Daughter of Shri Birdhi Lal Suman, Wife of Shri Lalit Suman Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamal Chand Khatuwal S/O Gulab Chand Kumawat Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijendra Sharma Vs State Panchayati Raj Dep Ors.

Rahul Sharma S/O Shri Prahlad Kumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Padam Chand Jain S/O Shri Kapoor Chand Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Brijesh Kumar S/O Shri Chhittar Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan