The High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur bench, dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner claiming reinstatement after he had already been reinstated by the respondents during the pendency of the case, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1876/2020
Radhey Shyam S/o Shri Babu Lal, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Indra Gandhi Nagar, Near Chauhan Nursing Home, Dcm, Kota (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order
18/08/2021
Counsel for the respondents submits that the during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has reinstated from the service vide order dated 26.03.2020. A copy of the order dated 26.03.2020 is taken on record.
In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Upendra Pratap Singh/214
Radhey Shyam S/o Shri Babu Lal
The State Of Rajasthan
Director, Local Self Department
Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Kethoon
Inderjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
