Petitioner challenged a notice issued by Gram Panchayat. Court held petitioner failed to show title in his favor. Court noted contentions require factual determination unsuitable for extraordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11454/2021
Malkhan Meena S/o Shri Laxman Meena, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Deeppura, Tehsil And District Karauli, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
06/10/2021
(2 of 2)
[CW-11454/2021]
(DINESH MEHTA),J
A.Arora/-163.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether this Court can determine factual aspects in a writ petition challenging a notice without showing title.
Whether the contentions raised need determination of factual aspects which cannot be entertained in extraordinary writ jurisdiction.
Malkhan Meena
State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan
Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan
District Collector, Karauli
Sub Divisional Officer, Karauli
Tehsildar, Tehsil Karauli
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
