Shankar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B.…
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 500/2021
Shankar S/o Shri Rajiya, Aged About 33 Years, B/c Meena, At Present Lodged In Open Air Camp Pratapgarh, Through His Mother Smt. Hudki W/o Shri Rajiya, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Village Patla Kuri, Hurawat Fala, Police Station Lasadiya, District Udaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati For Respondent(s) : Mr. Anil Joshi, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Judgment / Order
28/10/2021
Mr. Anil Joshi, learned AAG has informed to this Court the parole application preferred on behalf of the petitioner has already been rejected by the District Parole Committee, Udaipur (for short ‘the Committee’) vide order dated 27.10.2021, copy whereof, has been produced on record along with the factual report.
Learned AAG is directed to provide copy of the order dated 27.10.2021 passed the Committee to learned counsel for the petitioner.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this parole petition, however, seeks liberty for the
(2 of 2)
[CRLW-500/2021]
petitioner to file a fresh parole petition challenging the order dated 27.10.2021 passed by the Committee.
According, this parole petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty sought for.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
14-mohit/-
Shankar
State
Vijay Bishnoi
Sudes B Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court