The High Court dismissed a writ petition for parole as infructuous after the condition requiring the petitioner to furnish surety bonds was withdrawn by a later order.
The writ petition for parole is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1402/2021
Bablu @ Norat S/o Shri Suganchand, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Sendariya Police Station Adrash Nagar, District Ajmer (Raj.) Present Address- Ratidang, Police Station Krishchangang, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Open Air Camp, Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj.))
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.C. Swami for Mr. Rajesh Kala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Javed Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order
18/11/2021
Learned Public Prosecutor submits that since the condition requiring the petitioner to furnish two surety bonds has been withdrawn vide order dated 12.11.2021, this writ petition (parole) has been rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not deny the aforesaid fact.
In view of above, the present writ petition (parole) is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
(PRAKASH GUPTA),J
KuD/12
Bablu @ Norat
State Of Rajasthan
UMA SHANKER VYAS
PRAKASH GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
