Partly allowed

Purna Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Aug 2021CRLMP/981/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of three connected miscellaneous criminal petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIRs. In two cases, petitions were dismissed as infructuous following the Prosecutor's final report finding no offence. In the third, the petition was disposed of with a direction to the investigating authority to consider the petitioner's pending representat

What did the court decide?

Petitions 973/2021 and 981/2021 dismissed; Petition 972/2021 disposed of directing investigating authority to consider petitioner's representation within ten days.

Purna Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 973/2021

¶3

Purna Ram S/o Bhinwa Ram, Aged About 46 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Tryo Nagar, Udasar, Police Station, Jay Narayan Vyas Colony, Bikaner.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

Smt. Savitri Devi W/o Birjuram Bawri, By Caste Bavri, Permanent Resident Of Village Sui, Police Station, Mahajan, Bikaner. At Present R/o Prince Nahta Colony, Udasar, Bikaner, Police Station, Jay Narayan Vyas Colony, Bikaner.

¶8

----Respondents

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 972/2021

¶11

Purna Ram S/o Bhinwa Ram, Aged About 46 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Tryo Nagar, Udasar, Police Station, Jay Narayan Vyas Colony, Bikaner.

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶15

Basant Pal Nahta S/o Jeth Mal Nahta, By Caste Nahta, Nahto Ka Chowk, Near S.b.i. Bank, Bikaner.

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 981/2021

¶18

Purna Ram S/o Bhinwa Ram, Aged About 46 Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Tryo Nagar, Udasar, Police Station, Jay Narayan Vyas Colony, Bikaner.

¶19

----Petitioner

¶20

Versus

¶21

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶22

The Superintendent Of Police, Bikaner.

¶23

----Respondents

¶24

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Indra Raj Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP Mr. Rajendra Singh Rathore

¶25

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Order

(2 of 3)

[CRLMP-973/2021]

06/08/2021

CRLMP No.973/2021 (Purna Ram Vs. State of Raj.)

¶31

In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.

¶32

At the outset, learned P.P. submits that final report/closer report has been chalked out and no offence has been found to be

¶33

made out.

¶34

The instant misc. petition, thus, is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶35

The factual report furnished by learned P.P. is taken on record.

¶36

CRLMP No.972/2021 (Purna Ram Vs. State of Raj.)

¶37

In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant

¶38

caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.

¶39

The petitioner has preferred this misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking fair investigation FIR No.217/2020 lodged at P.S. Jay Narayan Vyas Colony, Bikaner for the offence under Sections 323, 354, 452, 336, 436 and 143 IPC.

¶40

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner wants to submit a representation alongwith all the relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority.

¶41

Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the petitioner submits a representation alongwith all the necessary documents before the concerned investigating authority within a period of ten days from today, then the same shall be considered strictly in accordance with law, before completing the

(3 of 3)

[CRLMP-973/2021]

investigation.

In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the petitioner submits a representation alongwith all the necessary documents before it within a period of ten days from today, then

¶46

the same shall be considered before completing the investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶47

CRLMP No.981/2021 (Purna Ram Vs. State of Raj.)

¶48

In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.

¶49

At the outset, learned P.P. submits that final report/closer report has been chalked out and no offence has been found to be made out.

¶50

The instant misc. petition, thus, is dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶51

The factual report furnished by learned P.P. is taken on record.

¶52

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶53

4-6-Nirmala/Sanjay-

Purna Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Purna Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandra Shekhar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jyoti Vs State of Rajasthan

Rana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Nerver Singh Vs State

Sanju Vs State of Rajasthan

Pramod Kumar Vs State