Disposed

Rampratap Dhaka v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Feb 2021CRLMP/952/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a quasha petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. fearing threat to life from a private respondent. The court directed petitioners to approach the local police station with representations for security assessment without affecting pending proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioners to appear before S.H.O., Police Station Jayal and submit representations for security assessment.

Rampratap Dhaka Vs State of Rajasthan — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 952/2021

¶3

Rampratap Dhaka S/o Sh. Ram Ram Dhaka, Aged About 21 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Village Magrasar, Churu, At Present R/o House No. 416 K, Bavariyon Ka Bas Or Sadak Ke Pas, Nimbi Jodhan, Village Nimbi Jodhan, Tehsil Ladnu, Nagaur (Raj.).

¶4

Sangita Manda D/o Sh. Narpat Ram W/o Rampratap Dhaka, Aged About 20 Years, B/c Jat, Village Gorau, Nimbi Jodhan, Nagaur.

¶5

----Petitioners Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

The Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer.

¶8

The Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur.

¶9

The S.h.o., Police Station Jayal, Jodhpur.

¶10

Sh. Narpat Ram S/o Chaukha Ram, B/c Jat, Village Gorau, Nimbijodhan, Nagaur.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Rajesh Choudhary
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	SS Rajpurohit,PP

¶13

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶14

Order

¶15

10/02/2021

¶16

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶17

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMP-952/2021]

¶20

facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondent No.5.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same.

¶22

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the S.H.O, Police Station Jayal alongwith appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The S.H.O, Police Station Jayal shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶23

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

¶24

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶25

225-Jitender/Sphophaliya/-

Rampratap Dhaka v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rampratap Dhaka v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nirma Patel Vs State of Rajasthan

Sukhpreet Kour Vs State of Rajasthan

Pooja Kumari Vs State of Rajasthan

Vena Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Champa Devi Vs State of Rajasthan

Lalita Vs State