The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed an S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous petition. The petition challenged the High Court's earlier judgment quashing a conviction. The present court found no gap or omission in the earlier judgment and refused to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 927/2014
Ramlal S/o Shri Lekhram R/o Swaroopsar, Police Station Sadar Fatehpur, District Sikar, Rajashthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhoop Singh Poonia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP Mr. Sumer Singh
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA
Order
14/09/2021
;kph us ;g ;kfpdk /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr fo}ku fuxjkuh U;k;ky; vij ls’ku U;k;k/kh’k dze&3 lhdj }kjk QkStnkjh fuxjkuh la[;k 76@2012 jkeyky cuke jkt- jkT; esa ikfjr vkns’k fnukad 29-01-2014 ls O;fFkr gksdj is’k dh gS ftlds }kjk ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr fuxjkuh [kkfjt djrs gq, fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk igys ls yafcr izdj.k esa /kkjk 395 Hkk-na-la- ds vijk/k dk izlaKku ysdj izdj.k dfeV djus ds vkns’k dh iqf"V dh gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk dguk gS fd bl izdj.k esa izLrqr iqfyl fjiksVZ ij vfHk;qDrx.k ds f[kykQ /kkjk 147] 392@149 rFkk 347@149 ds vijk/kksa ds fy, fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tk pqds FksA vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tkus ds i’pkr vfHk;kstu i{k ds izkFkZuk i= ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk
(2 of 3) [CRLMP-927/2014]
/kkjk 395 Hkk-na-la- ds vUrxZr iqu% izlaKku fy;k x;k vkSj ekeyk ls’ku U;k;ky; dks dfeV dj fn;kA iqfyl fjiksVZ ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vijk/kksa dk ,d ckj gh izlaKku fy;k tk ldrk gS] nqckjk izlaKku fy;k tkuk vuqKs; ugha gS] cfYd ;g vius gh iwoZorhZ vkns’k ds iquoZyksdu dh Js.kh esa vkrk gS ftlds fy, /kkjk 362 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr fopkj.k U;k;ky; l{ke ugha gSA vf/kd ls vf/kd vfHk;kstu lk{; vkus ds i’pkr /kkjk 319 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr fdlh vfHk;qDr fo’ks"k ds f[kykQ izlaKku gks ldrk gS] ysfdu bl ekeys esa fcuk vfHk;kstu lk{; ds vk/kkj ij gh iqu% izlaKku fy;k x;k gS tks fof/kiw.kZ ugha gSA vkyksP; vkns’k ds f[kykQ dh x;h fuxjkuh Hkh fuxjkuh U;k;ky; us ljljh rkSj ij [kkfjt dj nh gSA vkyksP; vkns’k vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSaA mUgksus vius leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d n`"VkUr is’k fd;s&
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd rFkk vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ dk dguk gS fd ls’ku U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.k ds nkSjku Lora= :i ls ekeys dks ns[kk tkuk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vkyksP; vkns’kksa esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ =qfV ugha gSA ;kfpdk [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Dharmpal Vs. St. of Haryana (2014)3 SCC 306 esa izfrikfnr fof/kd fLFkfr ds vuqlkj iqfyl fjiksVZ ij lafLFkr ekeys esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vijk/k Hkh tksMs tk ldrs gSa vkSj vfHk;qDr Hkh tksMs tk ldrs gSaA bl ekeys esa Hkh mijksDr fojks/kh nyhyksa ds
(3 of 3) [CRLMP-927/2014]
lanHkZ esa i=koyh dk voyksdu djus ij ;g Li"V fLFkfr lkeus vkrh gS fd iqfyl fjiksVZ ij lafLFkr bl izdj.k esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mijksDr vijk/kksa ds vkjksi fojfpr fd;s] ysfdu ckn esa vfHk;kstu i{k ds izkFkZuk i= ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquus ds i’pkr ;g ik;k fd bl ekeys esa ikap O;fDr;ksa ij ywV dk vkjksi gS ftlls izFken`"V;k /kkjk 395 Hkk-na-la- dk vijk/k curk gS vkSj ,slh fLFkfr ds pyrs fopkj.k U;k;ky; us ekeys dks /kkjk 323 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr ls’ku U;k;ky; dks dfeV fd;k gSA
/kkjk 323 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj fdlh Hkh ekeys dks fu.kZ; lquk;s tkus ls iwoZ ls’ku U;k;ky; dks dfeV fd;k tk ldrk gSA bl ekeys esa Hkh /kkjk 395 Hkk-na-la- dk vijk/k izFken"V;k cuuk ik;s tkus ij izdj.k ls’ku U;k;ky; dks dfeV fd;k x;k gSA ls’ku U;k;ky; }kjk vkjksi dh LVst ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquus ds mijkUr vkns’k ikfjr fd;k tkuk gSA ;fn /kkjk 395 Hkk-na-la- dk vijk/k izFken"V;k cuuk ik;k x;k rks vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tk;saxs vkSj fopkj.k dh dk;Zokgh iw.kZ dh tk;sxh] vU;Fkk /kkjk 228 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr ekeyk iqu% izfrizsf"kr fd;k tk;sxkA bu fof’k"V ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa vkyksP; vkns’kksa esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ =qfV vFkok vfu;ferrk n`f"Vxkspj ugha gksrh gSA vr% xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ er O;Dr fd;s fcuk izLrqr ;kfpdk bl funZs’k ds lkFk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd lacaf/kr ls’ku U;k;ky; }kjk nksuksa i{kksa dks lqudj fof/k&vuqlkj ;FkklaHko 'kh?kz vfxze dk;Zokgh dh tk;sxhA
(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J
Mittal /1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the constitutional validity of the High Court's judgment quashing the lower court's conviction in the present S.B. Criminal Appeal to be upheld by the High Court.
Whether any gap or omission occurs in the High Court's judgment in examining the aforementioned facts.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bajrang Singh Vs. St. of RajasthanReferred¶17
Bajrang Singh Vs. St. of Rajasthan 2004(2) Cr.L.R. (Raj.)1059
State of Rajasthan Vs. Kallo LalReferred¶18
State of Rajasthan Vs. Kallo Lal 2004(2) Cr.L.R. (Raj.)1062
Ganga Ram Vs. St. Of Rajasthan and Ors.Referred¶19
Ganga Ram Vs. St. Of Rajasthan and Ors. 2002(2) R.C.C. 564
St. of Gujrat Vs. Girish Radhakrishnan VardeReferred¶20
St. of Gujrat Vs. Girish Radhakrishnan Varde 2014 RCC(SC) 2
Ramlal
State Of Rajasthan
Narayan Singh
Satish Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
