Disposed

Rahul Balunda v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Feb 2021CRLMP/781/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order disposing of a criminal miscellaneous petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. invoking Article 21. The court directed petitioners to approach the Station House Officer to examine threat perceptions before granting any security, clarifying this does not stay criminal or civil proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Directing petitioners to appear before SHO, Parbatsar with representation to analyze threats; SHO may pass orders if necessitated.

Rahul Balunda Vs State of Rajasthan — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 781/2021

¶3

Rahul Balunda S/o Sh. Ugmaram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ward No. 06, Balunda Ki Dhani, Besroli, Makrana, District Nagaur (Raj.).

¶4

Sunita Inaniya D/o Sh. Daluram, Aged About 19 Years, R/ o Gram Darapura, Parbatsar, Nagaur District (Raj.).

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Of Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶8

The Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur.

¶9

The Sho, Police Station Parbatsar, District Nagaur.

¶10

Daluram Inaniya S/o Sh. Mangaram, R/o Gram Darapura, Parbatsar, Nagaur District (Raj.).

¶11

Chanaram Inaniya S/o Sh. Mangaram, R/o Gram Darapura, Parbatsar, Nagaur District (Raj.).

¶12

Mevaram S/o Sh. Amraram, R/o Gangva, Parbatsar, Nagaur District (Raj.).

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.VijayBishnoi.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.Vikram Sharma,PP.

¶15

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶16

Order

¶17

03/02/2021

¶18

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶19

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CRLMP-781/2021]

¶22

facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to the same amounts to violation of the same.

¶24

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the Station House Officer, Police Station Parbatsar, District Nagaur alongwith appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The Station House Officer, Police Station Parbatsar, District Nagaur shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶25

It is made clear that any observation in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

¶26

Stay petition also stands disposed of.

¶27

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶28

247-SPhophalia/Jitender/-

Rahul Balunda v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Balunda v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramchandra Dave Vs State

Chandra Mohan Vs State of Rajasthan

Poonam Chand Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishna Ram Vs State

Gulam Hussain Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Parvati Vs State