Allowed

Smt Sunita Kumari D/O Shri Kamal Kumar, Wife of Shri Mukesh Bagariya, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC27 Oct 2021CRLMP/6777/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed by two major individuals seeking protection for their life and liberty after marriage. An order was issued directing relevant police respondents to maintain vigil so no harm is caused by opposing relatives.

What did the court decide?

Allowed the petition and directed Respondent No.5 to keep vigil so that no harm is caused to the petitioners from their relatives.

Smt Sunita Kumari D/O Shri Kamal Kumar, Wife of… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6777/2021

¶3

Smt Sunita Kumari D/o Shri Kamal Kumar, Wife Of Shri Mukesh Bagariya, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Village Tajsar Khejdoliya, Tasar Badi, Tatanva, Police Station Sadar, Sikar, District Sikar (Raj). At Present R/o Village Piprali, Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Raj).

¶4

Mukesh Bagariya Son Of Pooran Mal, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Village Piprali, Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Raj).

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

Superintendent Of Police, Sikar, District Sikar (Raj).

¶10

S.h.o Police Station Sadar, Sikar, District Sikar (Raj). 5. S.h.o Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Raj).

¶11

Kamal Kumar Son Of Shri Ishwar Lal, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Village Tajsar Khejdoliya, Tasar Badi, Tatanva, Police Station Sadar, Sikar, District Sikar (Raj).

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kumar Sushil for Mr. Sumer Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. F.R. Meena, PP

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶15

Judgment / Order

¶16

27/10/2021

¶17

Petitioners have preferred this misc. petition seeking direction of protection of life and liberty.

¶18

Petitioners are present in person in the Court. As per the documents annexed, both are major. Certificate of Registration of marriage is also annexed with the petition.

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

[CRLMP-6777/2021]

¶21

Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in “ Smt. Nisha Tanwar vs. State of Raj.” (S.B. Criminal Writ No.493/2016), decided on 30.11.2016 allowed the petition and directed the S.H.O. concerned to ensure necessary vigil so that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of those who are opposing the marriage.

¶22

I have considered the contentions.

¶23

In view of the fact that petitioners are major and have married, the misc. petition is allowed. Respondent No.5 is directed to keep vigil so that no harm is caused to the petitioners from their relatives.

¶24

Stay application stands disposed.

¶25

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶26

NIKHIL KR. YADAV /146

Smt Sunita Kumari D/O Shri Kamal Kumar, Wife of Shri Mukesh Bagariya, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Sunita Kumari D/O Shri Kamal Kumar, Wife of Shri Mukesh Bagariya, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balaram Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Dharam Raj S/O Harkishan Vs State of Rajasthan

Sarafraj Mohd. Son of Late Ishaq Mohd. Vs State of Rajasthan

Umesh Yadav S/O Shri Harphool Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Laxmi Khanna Daughter of Shri Bhanwar Lal Khanna, Wife of Shri Manish Goswami, Vs State of Rajasthan

Purva Rana W/O Hemal Rameshsinh Chauhan D/O Vinod Kumar Rana, Vs State of Rajasthan