Dinesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court quashed an FIR and subsequent proceedings under Section 384 IPC upon finding that a compromise had been arrived at between the petitioner and the victim, relying on Supreme Court precedent Gian Singh.
What did the court decide?
FIR No.243/2021 and entire proceedings under Section 384 IPC qua the petitioner were quashed; stay petition disposed of.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3109/2021
Dinesh S/o Sh. Ganesh Lal Mali, Aged About 32 Years, Occupation Social Media Reporter, Cco News, R/o Shrinath Colony-A, Near Private Bus Stand, Nathdwara, Teh. Nathdwara, Dist. Rajsamand (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
- State, Through Pp
- Smt. Kala Devi W/o Sh. Vijendra Kumar Dadheech, Chopato Ka Baag, Nathdwara, Dist. Rajsamand (Raj.).
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Chaitanya Gahlot. |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. SS Rajpurohit, PP. Assisted by Mr. Ravindra Singh, ASI, PS Nathdwara. Mr. Vishal RajMehta. |
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR and subsequent proceedings should be quashed in view of the compromise between the parties.
Whether the ratio in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab applies to grant quashing of the challenged proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dinesh S/o Sh. Ganesh Lal Mali
- respondent
State, Through Pp
- respondent
Smt. Kala Devi W/o Sh. Vijendra Kumar Dadheech
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/3109/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court