The High Court of Rajasthan analyzed a plea to quash an F.I.R. and grant bail. It declined to quash the F.I.R. due to prima facie evidence of section 420 IPC but held bail applicable.
Petition to quash F.I.R. dismissed; Anticipatory bail granted pending trial; Bail not to be cancelled arbitrarily.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2986/2014
vejpan xqtZj iq= LoxhZ; Jh fd”kuyky xqtZj vk;q djhc 53 o’kZ fuoklh xzke pkSew[kka rglhy teokjkex<+] ftyk t;iqjA
-------;kph&vfHk;qDr
Versus
1& jktLFkku jkT; tfj;s yksd vfHk;kstd
2& lqjsUnz tks”kh iq= Jh Hkxoku lgk; tks”kh mez djhc 47 o’kZ fuoklh edku uacj ch&148] y{ehukjk;.kiqjh Fkkuk] xyrk jkexat] t;iqjA
------- foi{kh la[;k&2@ifjoknh
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Saini for Mr. Rajesh Kumar Saini, through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP Mr. Sanjay Verma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA
Order
10/08/2021
;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr ;g ;kfpdk mlds fo:) iqfyl Fkkuk] t;iqj fodkl izkf/kdj.k] t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&492@2014 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420] 406] 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dh dk;Zokgh dks lekIr djus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is’k dh xbZ gSA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh nyhysa gSa fd vkyksP; izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ flQZ nhokuh fookn dks vkijkf/kd jax nsus ds fy;s ‘kM;a= ls ntZ djokbZ xbZ gSA nksuksa i{kksa ds e/; fu’ikfnr vuqca/k esa jftLVªh djkus ds fy;s N% ekg dh vof/k fu/kkZfjr gS] ysfdu N% ekg dh vof/k esa u rks ifjoknh us cdk;k jkf”k nh gS vkSj u gh jftLVªh djokbZ gSA ;kph&vfHk;qDr ij vkjksi gS
(2 of 3) [CRLMP-2986/2014]
fd mlus fookfnr tehu ifjoknh dks cspus ds ckn nwljs O;fDr dks csp nh] ysfdu ftruh tehu dk lkSnk ifjoknh ds lkFk gqvk gS] mlls vf/kd tehu ;kph&vfHk;qDr ds LokfeRo esa ekStwn gSA ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ flQZ ncko cukus dh uh;r ls ntZ djokbZ gS] tks U;kf;d izfdz;k dk nq:i;ksx gS] vr% iz”uxr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dh dk;Zokgh vikLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh ,oa fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk dguk gS fd bl LVst ij ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d fofu”p; State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal esa izfrikfnr fof/kd fLFkfr ds eqrkfcd /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh ;kfpdk esa flQZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ gh ns[kh tk ldrh gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ;g lkQ vafdr gS fd ;kph&vfHk;qDr us tehu dk >kalk nsdj ifjoknh ls jkf”k ys yh vkSj ckn esa u rks jkf”k ykSVkbZ vkSj u gh jftLVªh djokbZ] cfYd og tehu fdlh nwljs O;fDr dks cspku dj nhA iqfyl us vuqla/kku ls ;kph&vfHk;qDr ds f[kykQ vijk/k lkfcr ekuk gSA ;kph&vfHk;qDr }kjk mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ij vuqla/kku ds nkSjku fopkj gks ldrk gSA ;kfpdk [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA
nksuksa i{kksa dh nyhyksa ij fopkj fd;kA
ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk M/s. Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC Online SC 315 esa izfrikfnr fof/kd fLFkfr ds vuqlkj izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dh dk;Zokgh rHkh lekIr dh tk ldrh gS] tc izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij dksbZ vijk/k ugha curk gksA tcfd bl ekeys esa iqfyl us vuqla/kku ds i”pkr /kkjk 420]406]120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k izekf.kr ekus gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa vkyksP; izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ lekIr gksus ;ksX; ugha gSA
;g fufoZokfnr fof/kd fLFkfr gS fd vuqla/kku ,tsalh dk ;g nkf;Ro gS fd og izR;sd vkijkf/kd ekeys dk vuqla/kku fu’i{k rjhds ls fof/k vuqlkj lEikfnr djsA fdlh fu’d’kZ ij igqapus ds igys cpko i{k }kjk j[ks x;s vk{ksiksa ij Hkh fopkj djsA ,slh n”kk esa vfHk;qDr pkgs rks vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh ds le{k viuk izfrosnu vko”;d nLrkostksa lfgr is”k dj ldrk gSA ;fn mlds }kjk izfrosnu ;k nLrkost is”k fd;s tkrs gSa rks vuqla/kku
(3 of 3)
[CRLMP-2986/2014]
vf/kdkjh }kjk mu ij fopkj djrs gq, vuqla/kku urhtk is”k fd;k tkuk okaNuh; ,oa vko”;d gSA
mijksDr foospu ds QyLo:i xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fuf”pr er O;Dr fd;s fcuk izLrqr ;kfpdk fuEu izdkj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd %&
(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J
Pradeep Thawani /04
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 to quash the First Information Report in these circumstances.
Whether the accused should be granted bail during the pendency of the criminal trial.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
LEJUIAN QAREZ IQ= LQX;ZH JH FD”KUYLE KXRE PKSEW[KKA RGLHY TEJOKIAKEX
STATE OF PUNJAB HARYANA SAHI OTISH
SATISH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
