Dismissed

Sanjay Raghunathprasad Gupta and Ors. v. State of Raj and Anr.

Rajasthan HC4 Aug 2021CRLMP/2884/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court rejected the petitioners' application to quash the F.I.R. under Section 482 CrPC. Relying on recent Supreme Court decisions, the Court held that corroborative evidence collected by the police justified proceeding with the investigation, thereby denying the request to quash the complaint.

What did the court decide?

The application to quash the F.I.R. and discharge the petitioners was dismissed.

Sanjay Raghunathprasad Gupta and… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2884/2018

¶3

Sanjay Raghunathprasad Gupta S/o Shri Raghunath Prasad Gupta, R/o 202, Dhananjay Towers, 100 Feet Road, Satellite, Ahmedabad.

¶4

Neelu Sanjay Gupta, W/o Sanjay Gupta, R/o 202, Dhananjay Towers, 100 Feet Road, Satellite, Ahmedabad.

¶5

Arvind Kumar Jagganath Prasad Gupta, S/o Shri Jagganath Prasad Gupta, R/o A-304, Sagar Samrat Apartment, Times Of India Press Road, Satellite, Ahmedabad.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶9

Mrs. Durga Sharma W/o Jagdish Sharma, R/o B-123, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Bansiwal, For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shyam Prakash Sharma, PP Mr. Deepak Chauhan,

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA

¶13

Order

¶14

04/08/2021

¶15

;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr ;g ;kfpdk iqfyl Fkkuk] cuhikdZ] t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&175@2017 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420]467]468]471]120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dh dk;Zokgh dks lekIr djus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k dh xbZ gSA

¶16

(2 of 3)

¶17

[CRLMP-2884/2018]

¶18

geus nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k

¶19

x;kA

¶20

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dh nyhysa gSa fd bl ekeys esa ;kph lat; j?kqukFkizlkn xqIrk dh eR;q gks pqdh gSA “ks’k nksuksa ;kphx.k funksZ’k gSaA nksuksa i{kksa ds e/; nhokuh izdfr dk fookn gSA ifjoknh us fookfnr lEifRr dk dCtk ysdj ;kphx.k dks gh lEifRr fdjk;s ij nh gS] fdjk;s dh jkf”k izkIr dh gS] ysfdu fdjk;s dh jkf”k izkIr djrs jgus rd dksbZ fjiksVZ ntZ ugha djokbZ gSA ikap lky ckn ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ gqbZ gSA tsMh, us “kq:vkrh izLrko ds foijhr “krsZa vf/kjksfir dj nh gSa] ftlls ;kphx.k ds lkFk /kks[kk gqvk gSA izR;FkhZ&ifjoknh ls yh xbZ jkf”k tek djk nh xbZ gSA iz”uxr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ U;kf;d izfdz;k dk nq:i;ksx gS] tks vikLr gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶21

nwljh vksj fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh ,oa fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dh nyhysa gSa fd ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k us izR;FkhZ&ifjoknh dks ;g >kalk fn;k fd mUgksaus tsMh, ls tehu vkoafVr djokbZ gS vkSj vkoaVu dh “krksZa ds vuqlkj dsacos uke ls xksYQ foyk cuk j[kh gS] ftls fodz; djus dk mUgsa iwjk vf/kdkj gSA muds >kals esa vkdj izR;FkhZ&ifjoknh us foyk [kjhnhA dqN le; rd ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k us foyk dk dCtk vius ikl j[kk] fdjk;k ifjoknh dks fn;k] ysfdu fnukad 28-08-2017 dks tsMh, dh lwpuk ij mls ekywe gqvk fd fookfnr tehu xksYQ dkslZ o xksYQ ,sdsMeh dh LFkkiuk ds fy;s vkoafVr gqbZ gS] foyk cukus ds fy;s vkoafVr ugha gqbZ gSA bl rjg vfHk;qDrx.k us vkoaVu dh “krksZa ds fo:) foyk cukdj izR;FkhZ&ifjoknh dks fodz; dj nh vkSj N% yk[k :i;s dh jkf”k gM+i yhA mUgksaus u dsoy ifjoknh ls] cfYd vU; yksxksa ls Hkh djhc 100 djksM+ :i;s dh /kks[kk/kM+h dh gSA izR;FkhZ&ifjoknh us bl /kks[kk/kM+h dk irk yxrs gh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djokbZ gS] vFkkZr mlds ikVZ ij dksbZ nsjh ugha gqbZ gSA /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dh dk;Zokgh rHkh lekIr dh tk ldrh gS] tc izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij dksbZ vijk/k ugha curk gksA U;k;ky; dks bl LVst ij xq.kkoxq.k ij leh{kk djus dh vko”;drk ugha gSA ;kfpdk [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA mUgksaus vius leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d n`’VkUr is”k fd;sA

¶22

[CRLMP-2884/2018]

¶23

(3 of 3)

¶24

1- (2018) 16 SCC 299 Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. CBI

¶25

2- 2021 SCC Online SC 206 Priti Saraf & Anr. Vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

¶26

3- (2018) 3 SCC 104 Dineshbhai Vs. State of Gujarat & Ors.

¶27

nksuksa i{kksa dh nyhyksa ij fopkj fd;k ,oa izLrqr U;kf;d n`’VkUrksa dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶28

fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ&ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr mijksDr U;kf;d n’VkUrksa rFkk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds gky ds fofu.kZ; M/s. Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC Online SC 315 esa izfrikfnr fof/kd fLFkfr ds vuqlkj fdlh Hkh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dh dk;Zokgh rHkh lekIr dh tk ldrh gS] tc izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij dksbZ vijk/k cuuk ugha ik;k tkrk gksA bl ekeys esa vkyksP; izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa of.kZr rF;ksa ls ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k ds f[kykQ mijksDr vijk/k izFken’V;k curs gSa] vr% vkyksP; izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dh dk;Zokgh lekIr fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA

¶29

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk fd;s x;s mijksDr vk{ksiksa ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ er O;Dr fd;k tkuk mfpr ,oa vko';d ugha gSA ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k vius reke vk{ksi vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh ds le{k j[kus dks Lora= gSa] ftu ij vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk fof/k vuqlkj fopkj djrs gq, vuqla/kku iw.kZ fd;k tk,xkA

¶30

mijksDr foospu ds QyLo:i izLrqr ;kfpdk ,rn~}kjk [kkfjt dh

¶31

tkrh gSA

¶32

(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J

¶33

Pradeep thawani/126

Sanjay Raghunathprasad Gupta and Ors. v. State of Raj and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Raghunathprasad Gupta and Ors. v. State of Raj and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Israni S/O Shri Nanikram Israni Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlender Singh Kurki Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Vinod Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Raghuveer Prasad Sharma, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit Kapopara S/O Babu Bhai Kapopara Vs State of Rajasthan

Rohit Kapopara S/O Babu Bhai Kapopara Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahaveer Singh S/O Late Shri Gordhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan