Disposed

Saroj Parihar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Sept 2021CRLMP/2685/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a special leave petition, the High Court of Rajasthan assembled at Jodhpur disposed of the matter by directing the Superintendent of Police to consider the petitioner's representation and relevant documents within 15 days before concluding the investigation under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed to submit representation; SP required to consider it within 15 days.

Saroj Parihar Vs State of Rajasthan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2685/2021

¶3

Saroj Parihar W/o Late Shri Phool Singh Parihar, Aged About 54 Years, By Caste Prihar, R/o A-7, Subhash Enclave, Airforce, Jodhpur (Raj.).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Praveen Dayal Dave
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. MS Bhati,PP

¶9

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶10

Order

¶11

07/09/2021

¶12

In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of all concerned.

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking fair investigation in FIR No.165/2021 registered at Police Station, Ratanada, District Jodhpur for the offence under Sections 392, 406, 420, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 506 & 120-B IPC.

¶14

In Manoj Kumaria Shankaria Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., 2014(3) Raj.CriC 965, Narayan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., 2013(1) Cri.L.R.264 and Aziza Begum Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr., 2012(1) RLW 835 , wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that a fair and proper

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMP-2685/2021]

¶17

investigation is always conducive to the ends of justice and for establishing rule of law.

¶18

In Shyam Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., 2015(3) Cri.L.R. 1375 and Gopal Nath Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., 2015(4) Cri.L.R. 1617 also the petitioner therein was permitted to submit a representation before the investigating officer and the investigating officer was directed to consider the documents before forming any opinion.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that fair and transparent investigation shall be made, and in case the petitioner submits a representation alongwith all the relevant documents before the Superintendent of Police, Jodhpur within a period of fifteen days from today, then the same shall be considered at the time of investigation.

¶20

In light of the aforesaid precedent law as well as the assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a direction to the Superintendent of Police, Jodhpur to consider the representation alongwith all the relevant documents, if submitted by the petitioner within a period of fifteen days from today, and shall ensure that fair investigation strictly in accordance with law is conducted by the concerned I.O.

¶21

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J

¶22

111-nirmala/Sanjay-

Saroj Parihar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saroj Parihar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shyam Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Dimple Vs State of Rajasthan

Shankar Lal Vs Devi Lal

Budha Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajij Khan Vs State of Rajasthan