Dismissed

Manisha v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Jan 2021CRLMP/155/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The Court directed petitioners to approach the SHO regarding their grievance and threat perceptions, leaving further security measures to the SHOs discretion based on analysis.

What did the court decide?

Directions to appear before SHO with representation; SHO to analyze threat and pass orders on security.

Manisha Vs State of Rajasthan — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 155/2021

¶3

Manisha D/o Champa Lal, Aged About 19 Years, Kumharo Ka Bash, Village Aatbada, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali.

¶4

Vikash S/o Chaila Ram, Aged About 26 Years, By Caste Prajapat, R/o Kumharo Colony, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

The Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur.

¶9

The Sho P.s. Bilara, District Jodhpur.

¶10

Champa Lal S/o Laduram, Village Aatabada, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali.

¶11

Rakesh S/o Champa Lal, Village Aatabada, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali.

¶12

Ramesh S/o Khangar Ram, Village Aatabada, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali.

¶13

Dilip S/o Khangar Ram, Village Aatabada, Tehsil Sojat, District Pali.

¶14

Kalu Ram S/o Santosh Ram, Kumharo Ka Bash, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur.

¶15

Santok Ram, Kumharo Ka Bash, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur.

¶16

----Respondents

¶17

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Trilok Singh
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sumer Singh Rajpurohit PP for the State.

¶18

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

¶19

Order

¶20

13/01/2021

¶21

In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

¶22

(2 of 2)

¶23

[CRLMP-155/2021]

¶24

The petitioners have preferred this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners on the ground that they are facing grave threat of life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have attained the age of majority.

¶26

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as perusing the record of the case, this Court disposes of the present petition with the direction to the petitioners to appear before the SHO, Police Station, Bilara, District Jodhpur alongwith appropriate representation regarding their grievance. The SHO, Police Station, Bilara, District Jodhpur shall in turn hear the grievance of the petitioners, and after analyzing the threat perceptions, if necessitated, may pass necessary orders to provide adequate security and protection to the petitioners.

¶27

It is made clear that this order is not a proof of age and any observations in this order shall not affect any criminal and civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners.

¶28

(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

¶29

163-SKant/-

Manisha v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manisha v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Keshar Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Suraj Singh Vs State

Vishnu Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jitendra Vs State

Smt Shilpa Kanwar Vs State

Devi Lal Vs State of Rajasthan