Allowed

Kalua Singh S/O Shri Bhurisingh, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Jul 2021CRLMP/1517/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash an FIR and consequential proceedings based on a compromise arrived at between the parties. Citing Supreme Court precedents, the court held it just and proper to quash the charges following the settlement.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.220/2020 registered at Police Station Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur along with consequential criminal proceedings were quashed.

Kalua Singh S/O Shri Bhurisingh, Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1517/2021

¶3

Kalua Singh S/o Shri Bhurisingh, Resident Of Hasanpur Gadoli, Police Station Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

¶4

Neetu S/o Shri Kalua Singh, Resident Of Hasanpur Gadoli, Police Station Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

¶5

Chhotesingh S/o Shri Kalua Singh, Resident Of Hasanpur Gadoli, Police Station Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶9

Narendra Singh S/o Shri Sitaram, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Hasanpur Gadoli, Police Station Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP Mr. Rajendra Prasad Yadav, Adv. through VC

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶13

Order

¶14

23/07/2021

¶15

This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR No.220/2020 dated 22.09.2020 registered at Police Station Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 336 and 354 of IPC and consequential criminal proceeding.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the respondent submitted that compromise has been

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-1517/2021]

¶18

arrived between the parties and they have settled their dispute. So, criminal proceedings pending between them, be set aside.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶20

Learned counsel for the complainant acknowledging the factum of compromise between the parties and submitted that he has no objection if the FIR in question and consequential criminal proceeding are quashed.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the record.

¶22

A perusal of the material on record shows that the dispute between the parties has amicably been settled by them. In view of compromise and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court of India in cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC 466 , this Court deems it just and proper to quash the FIR in question and consequential criminal proceeding.

¶23

Resultantly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. The FIR No.220/2020 dated 22.09.2020 registered at Police Station Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 336 and 354 of IPC and consequential criminal proceedings are quashed.

¶24

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶25

Jatin /35

Kalua Singh S/O Shri Bhurisingh, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalua Singh S/O Shri Bhurisingh, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramchandra @ Ramkaran S/O Shri Kaluram B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajajsthan

Nahar Singh S/O Shri Bhoma Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Madan Lal Meena S/O Shri Sita Ram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Singh S/O Surendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Narendra Singh S/O Shri Sitaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Gram Panchayat Chandsen Vs State of Rajasthan