Dismissed

Kailaram Son of Shri Bholaram, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Sept 2021CRLMP/1480/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petition to quash criminal proceedings. The court held that evidence collected during police investigation is material for the criminal trial and witnesses are immaterial for quashing proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Petition to quash criminal proceedings dismissed; parties directed to approach trial court.

Kailaram Son of Shri Bholaram, Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1480/2021

¶3

Kailaram Son Of Shri Bholaram, Resident Of Atiyasan, District Nagour (Raj).

¶4

Ashok Kumar Son Shri Brijmohan, Resident Of Post Dinarpur Via Katrasal, District Sikar, (Raj).

¶5

Azad Singh Son Of Shri Panne Singh, Resident Of Choradi (Aathuni), Post Bibasar, District Jhunjhunu (Raj).

¶6

Bhanwar Lal Son Of Shri Noparam, Resident Of Post Kasli, District Sikar (Raj).

¶7

Swarth Mal Son Of Shri Dhuraram, Resident Of Village And Post Majhua Via Jakhal, District Jhunjhunu (Raj).

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶11

----Respondent

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hem Singh, For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA

¶14

Order

¶15

18/09/2021

¶16

;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr ;g ;kfpdk fopkj.k U;k;ky;] vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] la[;k&02] vtesj }kjk QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k&1404@2011 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 19-01-2021 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh xbZ gS] ftlds }kjk ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks vkjksfir vijk/k ls mUeksfpr djus dk izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj fd;k x;k gSA

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-1480/2021]

¶18

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh xbZ ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶19

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dh nyhysa gSa fd bl ekeys esa vuqla/kku ds i”pkr is”k fd;k x;k vkjksi i= v/kwjk gS] ftlesa iw.kZ nLrkost is”k ugha fd;s x;s gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) yafcr vkijkf/kd dk;Zokgh vikLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA mUgksaus vius leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d n`’VkUr is”k fd;sA

¶20

1- 2002 Cri.L.J. 2571 Dharmarajan Vs. State

¶21

2- RLR 1990(2) 629 Davendra Kumar Vs. State of Raj.

¶22

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;k gSA

¶23

mijksDr nyhyksa ds lanHkZ esa vkyksP; vkns”k ds voyksdu ls Li’V gS fd bl ekeys esa ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k ds f[kykQ /kkjk 420]467]468]471 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa pkyku is”k gqvk gSA mlds ckn vfHk;kstu i{k dh vksj ls lkr xokg ijhf{kr gks pqds gSaA ,slk ugha gS fd pkyku ds lkFk tks nLrkost iqfyl }kjk is”k fd;s x;s gSa] os ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks ugha feys gSa] cfYd mudk dguk gS fd tks c;ku ;k nLrkost vuqla/kku ds nkSjku ,df=r fd;s x;s] os mUgsa ugha fnyk;s x;s gSaA pwafd iqfyl fjiksVZ@pkyku ds lkFk tks c;ku o nLrkost is”k fd;s x;s gSa] os gh ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k ds f[kykQ fopkj.k esa mi;ksx esa fy;s tkus gSaA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vkifRr;ksa dks bl LVst ij lqjf{kr j[kk gS] vFkkZr os cgl vfUre dh LVst ij viuh vkifRr;kWa mBk ldsaxs vkSj fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk mu ij fopkj djrs gq, fof/k fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k tk,xkA bl rjg vkyksP; vkns”k esa dksbZ xyrh ugha gSA

¶24

;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr mijksDr U;k; n’VkUrksa esa izfrikfnr fof/kd fLFkfr ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ fookn ugha gS] ysfdu bl ekeys eas pkyku ds lkFk is”k nLrkost o c;ku ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks izkIr gks pqds gSa ,oa ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vkifRr;ksa dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; us lqjf{kr j[kk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa izLrqr U;k; n’VkUr ds rF; o ifjfLFkfr;kWa fHkUu gksus ls ;kph&vfHk;qDrx.k dks buls dksbZ lgk;rk ugha feyrh gSA

¶25

mijksDr foospu dh jks”kuh esa izLrqr ;kfpdk ,rn~}kjk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA

¶26

(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J

¶27

Pradeep Thawani/25

Kailaram Son of Shri Bholaram, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailaram Son of Shri Bholaram, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hanuman Ram S/O Veerama Ram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Nipun Radhu S/O Late Shri Suresh Radhu Vs State of Rajasthan

Shanu S/O Abdul Latif, Vs State of Rajasthan

Sitaram Son of Shri Nankaram @ Nanakram Khatik, Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishor Kumar Son of Shri Budaram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Shreepal Choudhary S/O Heera Chand Choudhary Jain Vs State of Rajasthan