This court affirmed the decision of the single judge allowing surety proceedings against the petitioner to terminate maintenance and separate the parties after a breakdown of cohabitation inherited from a Step-Mother death.
Petition allowed, surety proceedings quashed, single judge order remanded to the High Court for fresh consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1245/2020
Banwari S/o Nandlal, Resident Of Village Arghoni, Behind Poultry Farm, Mathura Highway Road, Agra, Uttarpradesh.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar, For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA
Order
04/09/2021
;kph&vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr ;g ;kfpdk fuxjkuh U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] ckM+h }kjk QkStnkjh fuxjkuh la[;k&48@2018 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 17-09-2019 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh xbZ gS] ftlds }kjk ;kph&vizkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr fuxjkuh vLohdkj dj fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk izR;FkhZx.k&izkFkhZx.k jtuh ,oa mldh ukckfyx iq=h dks dze”k% ikap gtkj o nks gtkj :i;s dqy lkr gtkj :i;s izfrekg varfje Hkj.kiks"k.k fnyk;s tkus ds vkns'k dh iqf"V dh xbZ gSA
(2 of 3)
[CRLMP-1245/2020]
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dh cgl lquh ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu
fd;k x;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dh nyhysa gSa fd izR;FkhZ&izkfFkZ;k vkSj mldh cgu dh “kknh ;kph ,oa mlds HkkbZ ds lkFk gqbZA izkfFkZ;k jtuh us vius nsoj vFkkZr ;kph ds HkkbZ ds f[kykQ cykRdkj dh >wBh fjiksVZ ntZ djokbZ] ftlesa og nks’keqDr gks pqdk gSA izkfFkZ;k dks ;kph vius lkFk j[kus dks rS;kj gS] ysfdu fcuk fdlh dkj.k ds og lkFk jgus dks rS;kj ugha gS] fQj Hkh fopkj.k U;k;ky; us Hkj.kiks’k.k dk vkns”k ikfjr dj fn;k gS ,oa fuxjkuh U;k;ky; us ljljh rkSj ij fuxjkuh [kkfjt dj nh gSA ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ;Fks’B vkns”k ikfjr djus dh izkFkZuk dh
gSA
;kph&vizkFkhZ us Lo;a }kjk is'k dh xbZ fuxjkuh [kkfjt gksus ds vkns'k ds fo:) ;g ;kfpdk is'k dh gS] tcfd /kkjk 397¼3½ rFkk 399¼3½ n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj fuxjkuh U;k;ky; dk ,slk vkns'k vafre gksus dk izHkko j[krk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa izFker% ;g ;kfpdk iks"k.kh; ugha gS fQj Hkh izLrqr ;kfpdk ds fuLrkj.k ds fygkt ls bruk gh mYys[k fd;k tkuk i;kZIr gS fd fufoZokn :i ls izR;FkhZ&izkfFkZ;k ;kph dh fookfgrk iRuh gSA vc rd nksuksa dk fookg dk;e gSA muds ,d ukckfyx iq=h Hkh gSA izkfFkZ;k dh dksbZ Lora= vkenuh Hkh ugha gSA ;kph QSDVªh esa dke djrk gS vkSj viuh iRuh vkSj cPph ds Hkj.kiks’k.k dk nkf;Ro ;kph ij gSA izkfFkZ;k us ;kph ds fo:) ngst izrkM+uk dh fjiksVZ ntZ djokbZ gqbZ gS] vFkkZr mlds }kjk vyx jgus dk leqfpr dkj.k gSA gkykWafd dfFkr cykRdkj ds lanHkZ esa ntZ eqdnes esa vfHk;qDr lansg ds vk/kkj ij nks’keqDr gks pqdk gS] ysfdu mldh otg ls izR;FkhZ&izkfFkZ;k dk vius ifr ls Hkj.kiks’k.k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkj lekIr ugha gks tkrk gSA fo}ku fuxjkuh U;k;ky; us reke igyqvksa ij fopkj djrs gq, fuxjkuh [kkfjt dh gS ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkns”k esa dksbZ xyrh ugha ikbZ gSA vkyksP; vkns'k =qfV jfgr gSa] fygktk izLrqr ;kfpdk ,rn~}kjk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J
(3 of 3) [CRLMP-1245/2020]
Pradeep Thawani /05
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash a surety proceeding to terminate maintenance and separate custody.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Banwari S/o Nandlal
State Of Rajasthan
Rajni W/o Banwari
Ku. Minakshi D/o Banwari
Satish Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
