The High Court reviewed an order quashing an FIR under Section 73 of the CJPOA 2020, which was passed prematurely without completing the inquiry mandated by the same section.
The order quashing the FIR was set aside, restoring the matter to the lower court for conducting the mandatory inquiry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1015/2021
Ranjeet Singh Son Of Shri Rameshwar Lal, Resident Of Shyampura Poorvi, Police Station Ranoli, Tehsil Danta Ramgarh, District Sikar. (Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP Mr. Subhash, SI S.H.O. Police Station Dadiya, Sikar.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA
Order
15/09/2021
;kph us ;g ;kfpdk /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr fuxjkuh U;k;ky; ls’ku U;k;k/kh’k] lhdj }kjk QkStnkjh fuxjkuh ;kfpdk la[;k 73@2020 juthr flag cuke jkT; esa ikfjr vkns’k fnukad 07-09-2020 ls O;fFkr gksdj is’k dh gS ftlls ;kph dh fuxjkuh [kkfjt djrs gq, fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk izdj.k eas tCr’kqnk okgu cksysjks fidvi la[;k vkjts23&th-,-&9068 dks lqiqnZxh ij fn;s tkus ls badkj djus ds vkns’k fnukad 25-08-2020 dh iqf"V dh gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk dguk gS fd bl ekeys esa tCr’kqnk okgu dh pksjh ds laca/k esa fjiksVZ ntZ gks pqdh gS] fQj Hkh mDr okgu dks lqiqnZxh ij nsus ls euk dj fn;k x;k gSA ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA mUgksaus vius leFkZu esa bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk ,dyihB nkafMd fofo/k ;kfpdk
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-1015/2021]
la[;k 4580@2018 jkds’k cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku esa ikfjr vkns’k fnukad 10-01-2019 is’k fd;kA
mijksDr nyhyksa ds lanHkZ esa vkyksP; vkns’kksa dk voyksdu djus ij Li"V gS fd bl izdj.k esa tCr’kqnk okgu esa voS/k 'kjkc feyh gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us /kkjk 69 jktLFkku vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr okgu lqiqnZxh ij nsus ls badkj fd;k gSA fo}ku fuxjkuh U;k;ky; us Hkh reke nyhyksa ij fopkj djrs gq, fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh gSA
;kph }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUr esa ,slk okgu lqiqnZxh ij fn;k x;k gS ftlls voS/k 'kjkc ugha ik;h x;h gS] tcfd bl ekeys esa ,slh fLFkfr ugha jgh gSA bl rjg vkyksP; vkns’kksa esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ =qfV vFkok voS/krk ugha ik;h tkrh gS] ifj.kker% izLrqr ;kfpdk ,rn~}kjk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J
Mittal /6
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order quashing the FIR against the petitioner under Section 73 of the Cognizance of Flypet Offences Act 2020 at the level of F.I.R. Investigation Officer without conducting the in
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Ranjeet Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Satish Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
