The High Court revived the warrant of arrest against the petitioner in a Section 482 CrPC petition after examining the submissions and finding the conditions for release fulfilled upon deposit of Rs. 5000.
Summoning warrant quashed against Rs. 5000 deposit; otherwise warrant enforced immediately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1011/2020
Surendra Singh S/o Munshi Lal, At Present Driver 5728, Reserve Police Line, Jaipur, Permanent R/o Village Bahiran, Ps Kumher, District Bharatpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jeetendra Kumar Pandey For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA
Order
02/08/2021
;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds vUrxZr ;kfpdk U;k;ky;] vfrfjDr eq[; egkuxj eftLVªsV] dze&17] t;qj egkuxj }kjk QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k &77 @2015 muokuh ljdkj cuke lqjsUnz flag esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 08-02-2020 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftlds }kjk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls fxjQ~rkjh okj.V dks tekurh okj.V esa ifjofrZr djus ds fy, izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 70¼2½ n.M izfdz;k lafgrk vLohdkj dj fn;k x;k gSA
geus nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA
fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dh nyhysa gSa fd ;kph&vfHk;qDr is’ks ls jktLFkku iqfyl esa MªkbZoj ds in ij dk;Zjr gS rFkk fu;r rkjh[k is’kh ls iwoZ t;iqj ls ckgj mldk LFkkukUrj.k gks tkus ,oa vius vf/koDrk ls lEidZ ugha gks ikus ds dkj.k mls rkjh[k is’kh dh tkudkjh izkIr ugha gks ik;hA mls fxjQrkjh okj.V dh dksbZ tkudkjh izkIr ugha gqbZ rFkk mls izdj.k esa eQ:j ?kksf"kr dj fn;kA mlds }kjk LFkk;h fxjQrkjh okj.V dks tekurh okj.V esa rCnhy fd;s tkus gsrq
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-1011/2020]
izLrqr izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt dj fn;k x;k gSA og fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksus gsrq rRij gSA ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;kA
;kph&vfHk;qDr fopkj.k ds nkSjku vuqifLFkr gqvk gS] fygktk fxjQrkjh okj.V dks tekurh okj.V esa rCnhy fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA ckdh dqy gkykr esa ;g ;kfpdk bl funsZ’k ds lkFk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd ;fn ;kph&vfHk;qDr vkt ls 15 fnol ds Hkhrj fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k leiZ.k dj nsrk gS rks mlds fo:) tkjh LFkk;h fxjQrkjh okj.V dh fdz;kfUofr LFkfxr jgsxh vkSj mlds tekur vkosnu esa mBk;s x;s reke vk{ksiksa ij fopkj djrs gq, mldk vfoyEc fof/k&vuqlkj fuLrkj.k fd;k tk,xkA
;fn ;kph mDr vof/k esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k leiZ.k ugha djrk gS rks iz’uxr LFkk;h fxjQ~rkjh okj.V Lor% gh izHkkoh gksxkA
(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J
Mittal /26
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to revive the warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner when Rs. 5000 has been deposited for his release pending the High Court's consideration.
Whether the warrant of arrest will be executed if the petitioner fails to deposit the required amount within 15 days.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SURENDRA SINGH
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SATISH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
