Hari Kishan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged his detention under NDPS Act via fourth bail application. Court rejected argument of false implication noting prima facie evidence against him. Bail dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed; petitioner to remain in judicial custody.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9833/2021
Hari Kishan S/o Bhagwanaram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Sewdi, Tehsil Bagoda, District Jalore (Raj.) (Presently Lodged At District Jail, Sirohi)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
| ----Respondent | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Mr. |
M.R. Bishnoi and H.S. Bishnoi |
|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Javed Gauri, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
10/08/2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether petitioner falling under Section 8(1) of NDPS Act be enlarged on bail.
Whether false implication and lack of evidence justify bail at this stage.
Whether prima facie case established by prosecution witnesses bars bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hari Kishan
- respondent
State
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/9833/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court