Allowed

Dharmpal @ Kalu S/O Lalji v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC15 Nov 2021CRLMB/9822/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bench at Jaipur allowed anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding offences under Sections 323, 341, 354 and 379 IPC, directing release on bond if arrested, without deciding merits.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner directed to be released on personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties if arrested, subject to three conditions.

Dharmpal @ Kalu S/O Lalji Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9822/2021

¶3

Dharmpal @ Kalu S/o Lalji, R/o Majari Bhanda Ps Mundawar Dist. Alwar Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv.
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sher Singh Mahala, PP
	Mr. Deshraj Kalwania, Adv. for complainant

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶10

Order

¶11

15/11/2021

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.205/2021 registered at Police Station Mundawar, District Police Bhiwadi, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 323, 341, 354 and 379 IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation as per direction of this Court. Similarly situated co-accused Anchi Devi was enlarged on anticipatory bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Nothing is to be recovered from the petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-9822/2021]

¶18

case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶19

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Mundawar, District Police Bhiwadi, District Alwar in FIR No.205/2021 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Dharmpal @ Kalu S/o Lalji , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶21

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶22

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶23

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶24

Gourav/112

Dharmpal @ Kalu S/O Lalji v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmpal @ Kalu S/O Lalji v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hament S/O Rooparam Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishna @ Ramkishan (in J.C.) S/O Shri Hansraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashvani Kumar Jain S/O Shri Vimal Kumar Jain Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ishwar Choudhary S/O Late Shri Bhagwan Das Vs State of Rajasthan

Jeetendra S/O Gyarsi Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishangopal S/O Gobarilal Vs State of Rajasthan