Disposable bail application dismissed as having become infructuous because the application faced merely for seeking instructions, waiving further hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9776/2021
Amit S/o Umedsingh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Near Iti Mohalla Badabass, Kotputli, Distt. Jaipur (Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Kaushik For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, PP Mr. Sikander Ali Chopdar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
19/08/2021
Learned counsel for the complainant submits that bail application of the petitioner filed u/s 439 was rejected by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No.1, Kotputli, District Jaipur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has admitted the fact and prays for to seek instructions from his client.
Heard.
No instruction is required in this bail application. So, this bail application has become infrucutous.
Therefore, the bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Brijesh 36.
Amit S/o Umedsingh
State Of Rajasthan
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
