The court dismissed the bail application. The petitioner, facing charges under the N.D.P.S. Act, argued recovered items were not in commercial quantity. The Hon'ble Court refused bail, noting the petitioner has 14 criminal antecedents including five under the N.D.P.S. Act.
Bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9341/2021
Bhairulal Son Of Kanwarlal, Resident Of Kachhi Mohalla, Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj). ( At Present Petitioner Confined At District Jail Jhalawar )
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pranay Raj Singh Jhala, through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
26/07/2021
Jhalarapatan, District Jhalawar for offence under Sections 8/21 of N.D.P.S. Act.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-9341/2021]
State, I am not inclined to entertain the bail application.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
NIKHIL KR. YADAV /10
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who has 14 criminal antecedents including 5 cases under the N.D.P.S. Act.
Whether amount of recovered contraband being less than commercial quantity is a ground to grant bail in spite of antecedents.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bhairulal Son Of Kanwarlal
The State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
Nikhil Kr. Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
