Allowed

Sangeeta W/O Shri Darshan v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Jul 2021CRLMB/7236/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by Roopsingh and Smt. Sangeeta in connection with FIR No. 16/2020. The court ordered their release on bail subject to personal bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Allow anticipatory bail applications; release petitioners on bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to specified conditions.

Sangeeta W/O Shri Darshan Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6174/2021

¶3

Roopsingh S/o Shri Ramji Lal, aged about 31 Years, R/o Vill. Mongepura PS Mandrayal Dist. Karauli

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

Connected With

¶9

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7236/2021

¶10

Smt. Sangeeta W/o Shri Darshan, aged about 42 Years, R/o Village Nayagaon Police Station Mandrayal District Karauli

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Kumar Garg Mr. Anil Kumar Upman through video conferencing For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ramesh Choudhary, Public Prosecutor

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA Order

¶17

20/07/2021

¶18

These anticipatory bail applications have been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.16/2020, registered at Police Station Mandrayal, District Karauli for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 332, 353, 452 & 393 of IPC and under Section 131 of Representation of People Act, 1950, 1951, 1989.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the bail application of co-accused Ramniwas has already been granted by

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CRLMB-6174/2021]

¶22

the coordinate bench of this court vide order dated 18.03.2021

¶23

and the cases of the petitioners are not distinguishable to him. Hence, the anticipatory bail applications of the petitioners may be granted.

¶24

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail applications.

¶25

Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

¶26

Accordingly, these anticipatory bail applications are allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioners Roopsingh S/o Shri Ramji Lal and Smt. Sangeeta W/o Shri Darshan in FIR No.16/2020, registered at Police Station Mandrayal, District Karauli by the investigation officer, they shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of concerned SHO/IO on the following conditions:

¶27

i) That the petitioners will make themselves available for the investigation as and when required by the investigation officer.

¶28

ii) That the petitioners will not leave India without permission of the Court.

¶29

iii) That the petitioners will not temper with the evidence or threaten or pressurize the witnesses in the case.

¶30

(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J

¶31

Satyendra/4-5

Sangeeta W/O Shri Darshan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sangeeta W/O Shri Darshan v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tarkeshwari Chauhan W/O Shri Vijay Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mithilesh Kumar Dwivedi S/O Sh. Munnilal Dwivedi Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Singh S/O Shri Sumer Singh Chauhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Roopsingh S/O Shri Ramji Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishanlal Gupta @ Kishan Chand S/O Gopal Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishan Kumar Meena S/O Shee Ramgopal Meena Vs the State of Rajasthan