Allowed

Rukamkesh S/O Kamlesh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC26 Mar 2021CRLMB/5255/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismisses the state's opposition and grants bail to the petitioner. The court released the accused on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 along with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each under Section 439 Cr.P.C., noting that the trial is likely to take time.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Rukamkesh S/O Kamlesh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5255/2021

¶3

Rukamkesh S/o Kamlesh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Talavaka P.S. Sapotra District Karauli Raj. (Presently Confined In Dist. Jail Karauli)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Rajneesh Gupta	----Respondent
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	DeshrajGosingha,	PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR

¶9

Order

¶10

26/03/2021

¶11

This bail application has been filed under Section 439

¶12

Cr.P.C.

¶13

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No. 319/2020 was registered at P.S. Sapotra Distt. Karauli for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter he moved the bail application before the trial court, which vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this criminal case. Counsel further contended that co-accused person namely Hariom @ Halkey S/o Ramcharan has been granted bail by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.12.2020 in S.B.

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-5255/2021]

¶16

Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13332/2020 and the case of the present petitioner is on similar footings. It has also been contended that the accused petitioner is in judicial lockup since long, trial of the case is likely to take time, hence the accused petitioner be released on bail.

¶17

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for accused petitioner, note of the allegations levelled against the petitioner as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶19

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Rukamkesh S/o Kamlesh shall be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/(Rupees fifty thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J

¶21

Ashu/159

Rukamkesh S/O Kamlesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rukamkesh S/O Kamlesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pravesh Kumar S/O Late Shri Ganga Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohd. Asraf S/O Basir Vs State of Rajasthan

Harendra S/O Shri Ramshankar Vs State of Rajasthan

Geetaram S/O Shri Gilluram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Lokesh S/O Pappu Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukesh S/O Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan