Allowed

Vinod Kumar S/O Shiv Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Apr 2021CRLMB/4942/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was allowed. The High Court granted bail to the accused petitioner, Vinod Kumar, involved in an FIR for cheating and criminal conspiracy, subject to furnishing a personal bond and two sureties and complying with standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. with a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Vinod Kumar S/O Shiv Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4942/2021

¶3

Vinod Kumar S/o Shiv Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Pure Paremansha, District Amity (U.P.) (Accused Confined In District Jail At Bundi).

¶4

----Accused-Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

¶9

Order

¶10

07/04/2021

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 09/2021 registered at Police Station Gendoli, District Bundi for the offence under Section(s) 420, 406 & 120-B of IPC.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that as per the FIR, he has not received any amount from the complainant. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 07.03.2021, investigation as against him is complete, offences are triable by Magistrate, he has no criminal antecedents and prayed for his release on bail.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, nature of allegations against him, his length of custody, the material contained in the case

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-4942/2021]

¶16

diary, offences being triable by Magistrate and absence of criminal antecedents; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Vinod Kumar S/o Shiv Kumar shall be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/(Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

¶18

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

¶19

MADAN/41

Vinod Kumar S/O Shiv Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod Kumar S/O Shiv Kumar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jiya Chand Sikalgar D/O Chand Sikalgar Vs State of Rajasthan

Imran S/O Iqbal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sagas Singh S/O Madan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Gyarsilal Son of Shri Samlya Mogya Vs State of Rajasthan

Prahlad S/O Gopallal Vs State of Rajasthan

Aarif S/O Badam Khan Vs State of Rajasthan