Allowed

Shakir Mohammad S/O Hakeem Mohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 May 2021CRLMB/4639/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 CrPC, the High Court of Rajasthan allowed the petitioner's bail. The court observed that the petitioner was added as an accused based on interrogation, injuries were not life-threatening, and he lacked criminal antecedents, ordering release on a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Shakir Mohammad S/O Hakeem Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4639/2021

¶3

Shakir Mohammad S/o Hakeem Mohammad, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Gayatri Nagar Chaprasi Coloni Bhilwara P.s. Kotwali Bhilwara At Present Tenant House Baljeet Singh Sardar Nandvihar Coloni Opp. Church P.s. Borkhera Kota Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Kota)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.P. Meena for Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan through V.C. For State : Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP : Mr. Mahendra Kumar (I.O.) C.I. SHO Kota City.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶10

Order

¶11

03/05/2021

¶12

Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

¶13

F.I.R. No. 78/2021 was registered at Police Station Borkhera Kota for offence under Sections 341, 323 & 307 of I.P.C.

¶14

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. He is made an accused on the basis of interrogation of co-accused Imran. None of the injuries sustained by the injured is dangerous to life. Petitioner is not having criminal antecedents.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-4639/2021]

¶18

I have considered the contentions.

¶19

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶20

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to

¶21

do so.

¶22

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶23

Amit/11

Shakir Mohammad S/O Hakeem Mohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shakir Mohammad S/O Hakeem Mohammad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rani @ Kaur W/O Shri Jagseer Singh @ Jagga Vs State of Rajasthan

Deepak @ Guddan S/O Shri Mohan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Chaturbhuj Sharma Son of Sh. Bhagwan Das Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhairuram S/O Kajodmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Kumar S/O Choturam Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahaveer Prasad Son of Shri Chotu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan