Subhash v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This second bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as the High Court was not inclined to grant anticipatory bail despite coaccused obtaining regular bail and the petitioner being a government employee.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to surrender and file regular bail application for expeditious disposal.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 3411/2021
Subhash S/o Sh. Ram Kishore, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Bhakrod, Tehsil And District Nagaur.
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. Sumeha Kalla |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mohd Javed Gauri, PP |
| For complainant(s) | : Mr. Ram Vilas |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
18/08/2021
This is second bail application preferred on behalf of the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted where coaccused have already been released on regular bail
Whether the petitioner being a government servant is a relevant ground for granting anticipatory bail
Whether denial of anticipatory bail warrants issuance of guidelines for senior trial court
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Subhash
- respondent
State
Coram
Vijay Bishnoi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/3411/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court