Allowed

Tinku @ Teekam Chand S/O Kamlesh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Dec 2021CRLMB/20808/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an accused petitioner. The court deemed it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail, directing him to furnish a personal bond and two sureties while appearing before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Tinku @ Teekam Chand S/O Kamlesh Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 20808/2021

¶3

Tinku @ Teekam Chand S/o Kamlesh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No. 1 Holi Ki Tek, Khilchipur, P.S. Kotwali Dist. Sawaimadhopur Raj.

¶4

(Presently Confined In Distt. Jail Tonk)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kabra For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶10

Order

¶11

20/12/2021

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No.0120/2021 was registered at P.S. Uniara, District Tonk for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner was arrested. Thereafter, he moved the bail application before the trial court, which vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence, this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case as he has nothing to do with the alleged incident. Counsel further submits that the accused petitioner is behind bars since long.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-20808/2021]

¶17

Conclusion of the trial may likely to take time. Hence the accused petitioner be released on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for accused petitioner, note of the allegations levelled against the petitioner as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner Tinku @ Teekam Chand S/o Kamlesh shall be released on bail in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶22

Ritu/74

Tinku @ Teekam Chand S/O Kamlesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tinku @ Teekam Chand S/O Kamlesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Monu S/O Mansingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Laxman S/O Kana Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul S/O Shri Hajarilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravi Kumar S/O Ramphal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ajeet S/O Jogendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Balaram Son of Lalaram Vs State of Rajasthan