Allowed

Vijay Sehara S/O Prabhuram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Nov 2021CRLMB/18474/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous bail application was filed by an accused person confined in sub-jail. The High Court, considering the contentions and facts without expressing an opinion on the merits, allowed the application and granted bail subject to furnishing a bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Vijay Sehara S/O Prabhuram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 18474/2021

¶3

Vijay Sehara S/o Prabhuram, R/o Kalota Ps Khetri Distt. Jhunjhunu Raj. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Sambhar Lake Distt. Jaipur )

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

¶9

Order

¶10

17/11/2021

¶11

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.233/2021 Registered at Police Station Dudu, Jaipur (Rural) for the offence(s) under Sections 379, 384, 120-B IPC, Section 4/21 of the Mines and Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Section 54, 60 of the Rajasthan Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 03.11.2021. Similarly situated co-accused Mahendra Singh Meena, Narayan Singh and Omsingh were enlarged on bail by the coordinate benches of this Court and conclusion of trial may take long time.

¶13

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-18474/2021]

¶16

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Vijay Sehara S/o Prabhuram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶18

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

¶19

Jatin /51

Vijay Sehara S/O Prabhuram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Sehara S/O Prabhuram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yogendra S/O Shri Damodar Vs State of Rajasthan

Raghuveer Singh @ Fauji S/O Shyoram Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vikas Choudhary S/O Late Prithvi Singh Choudhary Vs the State of Rajasthan

Onkarmal S/O Phoolchand Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammdin S/O Mangtu Vs State of Rajasthan

Navratan Swami S/O Ramlakhan Vs State of Rajasthan